Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas: Imaging Findings Compared With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

被引:8
|
作者
Xu, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiao-ju [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao-er [1 ]
Pan, Fu-shun [1 ]
Tan, Yang [1 ]
Huang, Tong-yi [1 ]
Hong, Yu [3 ]
Huang, Guang-liang [1 ]
Xie, Xiao-yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Med Ultrasound, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Ultrasound, Affiliated Hosp 1, 58 Zhong Shan Rd 2, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
contrast-enhanced computed tomography; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; diagnosis; pancreas; solid pseudopapillary tumor; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; NEOPLASM; FEATURES; SONOGRAPHY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1002/jum.15036
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the characterization and usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for diagnosing solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas (SPTP) and compare the enhancement patterns with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). MethodsForty-three SPTP lesions proved by pathologic findings in 42 patients examined with CEUS and CECT were included in this study. The enhancement characteristics and typical CEUS features of the tumors were investigated. These characteristics were compared according to lesion sizes. The enhancement patterns of CEUS were compared with CECT. ResultsThe most common enhancement levels of SPTP in the early phase and late phase for CEUS were isoenhancement (19 of 43 [44.2%]) and hypoenhancement (32 of 43 [74.4%]), respectively. The 4 most common enhancement patterns were hypo-hypo (16 of 43 [37.2%]), iso-iso (11 of 43 [25.6%]), hyper-hypo (8 of 43 [18.6%]), and iso-hypo (8 of 43 [18.6%]) enhancement. For the 43 SPTP lesions, typical CEUS features such as lesion membrane, intralesional vessel, and intralesional compartmentalization enhancements were detected in 30 (69.8%), 27 (62.8%), and 10 (23.2%) cases. Compared with CECT, isoenhancement during the early phase and hypoenhancement during the late phase were the most common imaging characteristics of CEUS. ConclusionsLesion membrane, intralesional vessel, and intralesional compartmentalization enhancements are typical CEUS features of SPTP, especially for large lesions (lesion size >= 3.0 cm). Isoenhancement during the early phase and hypoenhancement during the late phase are the most common imaging characteristics of CEUS and CECT, making CEUS a viable alternative diagnostic method that is noninvasive.
引用
收藏
页码:3247 / 3255
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance
    Cantisani, Vito
    Grazhdani, Hektor
    Fioravanti, Cristina
    Rosignuolo, Maria
    Calliada, Fabrizio
    Messineo, Daniela
    Bernieri, Maria Giulia
    Redler, Adriano
    Catalano, Carlo
    D'Ambrosio, Ferdinando
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (29) : 9998 - 10007
  • [22] Molecular imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Miles, K. A.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 65 (07) : 549 - 556
  • [23] HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK AND CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THE PANCREAS
    NUUTINEN, P
    KIVISAARI, L
    LEHTOLA, A
    TALJA, M
    STANDERTSKJOLDNORDENSTAM, CG
    LEMPINEN, M
    SCHRODER, T
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 21 (04) : 483 - 486
  • [24] Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Brix, G.
    Griebel, J.
    Delorme, S.
    RADIOLOGE, 2012, 52 (03): : 277 - 296
  • [25] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Fundamentals: The Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Contrast. Basics of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
    Fontanilla Echeveste, M. T.
    Ripolles Gonzalez, T.
    Aguirre Pascual, E.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2024, 66 : S36 - S50
  • [26] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Findings
    Lorenz, Judith
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (11) : 1068 - 1068
  • [27] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound with That of Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Spycher, Samuel C. J.
    Buettiker, Sophia M.
    Gross, Tobias
    Bosshard, Piet
    Thalmann, George N.
    Schneider, Marc P.
    Roth, Beat
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (04): : 464 - 473
  • [28] Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of solid renal tumors
    Tamai, H
    Takiguchi, Y
    Oka, M
    Shingaki, N
    Enomoto, S
    Shiraki, T
    Furuta, M
    Inoue, I
    Iguchi, M
    Yanaoka, K
    Arii, K
    Shimizu, Y
    Nakata, H
    Shinka, T
    Sanke, T
    Ichinose, M
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (12) : 1635 - 1640
  • [29] Contrast-enhanced power Doppler endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic diseases: Comparison with contrast-enhanced extracorporal harmonic ultrasound and computed tomography
    Kitano, M
    Kudo, M
    Nakaoka, R
    Suetomi, Y
    Shiomi, M
    Fukuda, N
    Matsui, S
    Kawasaki, T
    Maekawa, K
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (04) : S123 - S123
  • [30] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Solid Renal Lesions
    Zbroja, Monika
    Kuczynska, Maryla
    Drelich, Katarzyna
    Mikos, Eryk
    Zarajczyk, Agata
    Cheda, Mateusz
    Dabrowska, Izabela
    Drelich-Zbroja, Anna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (13)