A Comparative Study of Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols on a Mobility Model in Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET)

被引:0
作者
Appiah, Martin [1 ]
Cudjoe, Rita [2 ]
机构
[1] Vaal Univ Technol, Dept Informat & Commun Technol, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
[2] Vaal Univ Technol, Dept Software Studies, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
来源
2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART COMPUTING AND ELECTRONIC ENTERPRISE (ICSCEE) | 2018年
关键词
Manet; Mobility Model; Routing Protocols; Pause Time; Average Delay; Average Throughput; Average Traffic Received;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) consists of wireless nodes that are placed randomly and dynamically which results in the rapid change between the nodes. In any given situation on MANET, the choice of a routing protocol should be considered and by doing so, factors such as the mobility model, mobility of nodes, the network size and packet size should be taken into consideration because the routing protocols configured with the mobility model can highly affect the performance of MANET. This paper analysed the impact of two different routing protocols (i.e. Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR)) on the performance of Manet_Down_Left (MDL) mobility model. The simulated results indicated that Manet_Down_Left (MDL) configured with OLSR protocol performed better than MDL configured with DSR protocol.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abolhasan M., 2004, AD HOC NETW, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1570-8705(03)00043-X
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Proc. of ACM Workshop on Principle of Mobile Computing, DOI DOI 10.1145/584490.584499
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OPNET MODELER
[4]  
Ariyakhajorn J., 2006, ISCIT 2006
[5]   Impact of mobility on the performance of ad hoc wireless networks [J].
Bhatt, M ;
Chokshi, R ;
Desai, S ;
Panichpapiboon, S ;
Wisitpongphan, N ;
Tonguz, OK .
2003 IEEE 58TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :3025-3029
[6]   Performance evaluation of routing protocols for ad hoc wireless networks [J].
Boukerche, A .
MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS, 2004, 9 (04) :333-342
[7]  
Broch J., 1998, MobiCom'98. Proceedings of Fourth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, P85, DOI 10.1145/288235.288256
[8]   A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research [J].
Camp, T ;
Boleng, J ;
Davies, V .
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING, 2002, 2 (05) :483-502
[9]   Group mobility impact over TCP and CBR traffic in mobile ad hoc networks [J].
Cano, JC ;
Manzoni, P .
12TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED AND NETWORK-BASED PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, :382-389
[10]   Evaluation Model of The Lay-out of Sickbeds That Based on The Overall Satisfaction [J].
Cao, Le-Si ;
Zhang, Yuan-Biao ;
Chang, Cheng ;
Deng, Dong-Xin .
2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER CONTROL (ICACC 2010), VOL. 4, 2010, :307-311