Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol

被引:20
|
作者
Jenniches, Imke [1 ]
Lemmen, Clarissa [2 ]
Cwik, Jan Christopher [3 ]
Kusch, Michael [4 ]
Labouvie, Hildegard [4 ]
Scholten, Nadine [1 ]
Gerlach, Alexander [5 ]
Stock, Stephanie [2 ]
Samel, Christina [6 ]
Hagemeier, Anna [6 ]
Hellmich, Martin [6 ]
Haas, Peter [7 ]
Hallek, Michael [4 ]
Pfaff, Holger [1 ]
Dresen, Antje [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, IMVR Inst Med Sociol, Hlth Serv Res & Rehabil Sci IMVR, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Hlth Econ & Clin Epidemiol, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Internal Med, Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Cologne, Dept Psychol, Cologne, Germany
[6] Univ Cologne, Inst Med Stat & Computat Biol, Cologne, Germany
[7] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Dortmund, Dept Comp Sci Med Informat, Dortmund, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER-PATIENTS; ANXIETY; INTERVENTIONS; DEPRESSION; DISTRESS; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034141
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction International standards of care require the complete integration of psycho-oncological care into biomedical cancer treatment. The structured integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological programme 'isPO' is aiming to ensure a provision of care in inpatient and outpatient settings according to a stepped-care approach. Up to now, psycho-oncological care is missing regulated and standardised processes to demonstrate the effectiveness. This study protocol describes the process and outcome evaluation that is conducted, along with the isPO study. The programme evaluation is aiming to proof effectiveness, explain potential discrepancies between expected and observed outcomes. Additionally, provide insight into the implementation process, as well as contextual factors that might promote or inhibit the dissemination and implementation of the stepped care programme will be gained. In addition to these measures, a cost-consequence analysis will provide further evidence aimed at integrating psycho-oncological care into primary healthcare. Methods and analysis The evaluation concept is based on a tripartite strategy consisting of a prospective, formative and summative evaluation. To capture all determinants, a concurrent mixed-method design is applied comprising qualitative (interviews and focus groups) and quantitative (standardised questionnaires) surveys of patients and healthcare providers. In addition, analysis of the psycho-oncological care data (isPO care data) and statutory health insurance claims data will be conducted. Primary and secondary data will complement one another (data linkage) to obtain a more comprehensive picture of the effectiveness and implementation of the complex intervention within the isPO study. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne. For all collected data, the relevant national and European data protection regulations will be considered. All personal identifiers (eg, name, date of birth) will be pseudonymised. Dissemination strategies include annual reports as well as quality workshops for the organisations, the presentation of results in publications and on conferences, and public relations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development, piloting and evaluation of an app-supported psychosocial prevention intervention to strengthen participation in working life: a study protocol of a mixed-methods approach
    Stephan, Johannes
    Gehrmann, Jan
    Stullich, Ananda
    Hoffmann, Laura
    Richter, Matthias
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [32] Safety and Health through Integrated, Facilitated Teams (SHIFT): stepped-wedge protocol for prospective, mixed-methods evaluation of the Healthy Workplace Participatory Program
    Punnett, Laura
    Nobrega, Suzanne
    Zhang, Yuan
    Rice, Serena
    Gore, Rebecca
    Kurowski, Alicia
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [33] Implementation process and outcomes of a mental health programme integrated in primary care clinics in rural Mexico: a mixed-methods study
    Miguel-Esponda, Georgina
    Bohm-Levine, Nathaniel
    Gabriela Rodriguez-Cuevas, Fatima
    Cohen, Alex
    Kakuma, Ritsuko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 14 (01)
  • [34] Implementation process and outcomes of a mental health programme integrated in primary care clinics in rural Mexico: a mixed-methods study
    Georgina Miguel-Esponda
    Nathaniel Bohm-Levine
    Fátima Gabriela Rodríguez-Cuevas
    Alex Cohen
    Ritsuko Kakuma
    International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 14
  • [35] A mixed-methods study of the Care Needs of individuals with idiopathic Pulmonary fibrosis and their carers-CaNoPy: a study protocol
    Byrne, Anthony
    Sampson, Cathy
    Baillie, Jessica
    Harrison, Kim
    Hope-Gill, Ben
    Hubbard, Richard
    Griffiths, Gareth
    Nelson, Annmarie
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (08):
  • [36] Mixed-methods evaluation of a structured primary care programme for children and adolescents with mental health problems (PrimA-QuO): a study protocol
    Loidl, Verena
    Decke, Siona
    Hamacher, Karina
    Lang, Martin
    Laub, Otto
    Marijic, Pavo
    Murawski, Monika
    Schwettmann, Lars
    Grill, Eva
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [37] Burden, determinants, consequences and care of multimorbidity in rural and urbanising Telangana, India: protocol for a mixed-methods study within the APCAPS cohort
    Lieber, Judith
    Banjara, Santosh Kumar
    Mallinson, Poppy Alice Carson
    Mahajan, Hemant
    Bhogadi, Santhi
    Addanki, Srivalli
    Birk, Nick
    Song, Wenbo
    Shah, Anoop S. V.
    Kurmi, Om
    Iyer, Gowri
    Kamalakannan, Sureshkumar
    Galla, Raghu Kishore
    Sadanand, Shilpa
    Dasi, Teena
    Kulkarni, Bharati
    Kinra, Sanjay
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [38] Integrated Child and Family Hub models for detecting and responding to family adversity: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation in two sites
    Hall, Teresa
    Goldfeld, Sharon
    Loftus, Hayley
    Honisett, Suzy
    Liu, Hueiming
    De Souza, Denise
    Bailey, Cate
    Reupert, Andrea
    Yap, Marie B. H.
    Eapen, Valsamma
    Haslam, Ric
    Sanci, Lena
    Fisher, Jane
    Eastwood, John
    Mukumbang, Ferdinand C.
    Loveday, Sarah
    Jones, Renee
    Constable, Leanne
    Forell, Suzie
    Morris, Zoe
    Montgomery, Alicia
    Pringle, Glenn
    Dalziel, Kim
    Hiscock, Harriet
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [39] The influence of cross-sectoral treatment models on patients with mental disorders in Germany: study protocol of a nationwide long-term evaluation study (EVA64)
    Neumann, Anne
    Swart, Enno
    Haeckl, Dennis
    Kliemt, Roman
    March, Stefanie
    Kuester, Denise
    Arnold, Katrin
    Petzold, Thomas
    Baum, Fabian
    Seifert, Martin
    Weiss, Jessika
    Pfennig, Andrea
    Schmitt, Jochen
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 18
  • [40] The influence of cross-sectoral treatment models on patients with mental disorders in Germany: study protocol of a nationwide long-term evaluation study (EVA64)
    Anne Neumann
    Enno Swart
    Dennis Häckl
    Roman Kliemt
    Stefanie March
    Denise Küster
    Katrin Arnold
    Thomas Petzold
    Fabian Baum
    Martin Seifert
    Jessika Weiß
    Andrea Pfennig
    Jochen Schmitt
    BMC Psychiatry, 18