A biomechanical analysis of anterior load carriage

被引:38
作者
Anderson, A. M. [1 ]
Meador, K. A. [1 ]
McClure, L. R. [1 ]
Makrozahopoulos, D. [1 ]
Brooks, D. J. [1 ]
Mirka, G. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Edward P Fitts Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Ergon Lab, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
lumbar; electromyography; motion analysis; agriculture;
D O I
10.1080/00140130701450195
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Front load carriage is a common occupational task in some industries ( e. g. agriculture, construction), but, as compared to lifting tasks, relatively little research has been conducted on the biomechanical loading during these activities. The focus of this study was to explore the low back biomechanics during these activities and, specifically, to examine the effects of load height and walking speed on trunk muscle activity and trunk posture. Eleven male participants participated in two separate front load-carriage experiments. The first experiment called for carrying a barbell ( with weight corresponding to 20% of elbow flexion strength) at three heights ( knuckle height, elbow height and shoulder height) at a constant horizontal distance from the spine. The second experiment called for participants to carry a bucket of potatoes weighing 14 kg at the same three heights, but with no further restrictions in technique. In both experiments, the participants performed this task while either standing still or walking at a self-selected speed. As they performed these tasks, the activity levels of the right-side muscle of the rectus abdominis, external oblique, biceps brachii, anterior deltoid and three levels (T9, T12 and L3) of the erector spinae were sampled. Mid-sagittal plane trunk posture was also quantified using three magnetic field-based motion sensors at T9, T12 and L3. The results showed a significant effect of both walking speed and load height on trunk posture and trunk muscle activity levels in both the barbell and bucket experiments. In the barbell experiment, the walking trials generated 43% more trunk muscle activity than the standing trials. Trials at shoulder height produced 11% more muscle activity than trials at elbow height in the T9 erector spinae muscles and 71% more muscle activity in the anterior deltoid. In the bucket experiment, trunk muscle activity responded in a similar fashion, but the key result here was the quanti. cation of the natural hyperextension posture of the spine used to balance the bucket of potatoes. These results provide insight into muscle activation patterns
引用
收藏
页码:2104 / 2117
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF LOAD PLACEMENT ON BACK MUSCLE-ACTIVITY IN LOAD CARRIAGE [J].
BOBET, J ;
NORMAN, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 53 (01) :71-75
[2]   THE EFFECTS OF LOAD PLACEMENT ON THE EMG ACTIVITY OF THE LOW-BACK MUSCLES DURING LOAD CARRYING BY MEN AND WOMEN [J].
COOK, TM ;
NEUMANN, DA .
ERGONOMICS, 1987, 30 (10) :1413-1423
[3]   Effects of varying backpack loads on peak forces in the lumbosacral spine during walking [J].
Goh, JH ;
Thambyah, A ;
Bose, K .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 :S26-S31
[4]   Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability [J].
Granata, KP ;
Orishimo, KF .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 34 (09) :1117-1123
[5]   Increased musculoskeletal stiffness during load carriage at increasing walking speeds maintains constant vertical excursion of the body center of mass [J].
Holt, KG ;
Wagenaar, RC ;
LaFiandra, ME ;
Kubo, M ;
Obusek, JP .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 36 (04) :465-471
[6]   Load carriage using packs: A review of physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects [J].
Knapik, J ;
Harman, E ;
Reynolds, K .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1996, 27 (03) :207-216
[7]   Epidemiologic evidence on manual materials handling as a risk factor for back disorders: a systematic review [J].
Kuiper, JI ;
Burdorf, A ;
Verbeek, JHAM ;
Frings-Dresen, MHW ;
van der Beek, AJ ;
Viikari-Juntura, ERA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 1999, 24 (04) :389-404
[8]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL DETERMINATION AND MODELING OF LOAD-CARRYING CAPACITY [J].
LU, H ;
AGHAZADEH, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 1994, 13 (01) :51-65
[9]   AN ERGONOMIC STUDY OF WORK METHODS AND PHYSICAL DISORDERS AMONG PROFESSIONAL BUTCHERS [J].
MAGNUSSON, M ;
ORTENGREN, R ;
ANDERSSON, GBJ ;
PETERSEN, I ;
SABEL, B .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1987, 18 (01) :43-50
[10]  
Marras W.S., 1990, INT J IND ERGONOM, V6, P89