A model-based cluster analysis approach to adolescent problem behaviors and young adult outcomes

被引:56
作者
Mun, Eun Young [1 ]
Windle, Michael [2 ]
Schainker, Lisa M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Ctr Alcohol Studies, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S095457940800014X
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Data from a community-based sample of 1,126 10th- and 11th-grade adolescents were analyzed using a model-based cluster analysis approach to empirically identify heterogeneous adolescent subpopulations from the person-oriented and pattern-oriented perspectives. The model-based cluster analysis is a new clustering procedure to investigate population heterogeneity utilizing finite mixture multivariate normal densities and accordingly to classify subpopulations using more rigorous statistical procedures for the comparison of alternative models. Four cluster groups were identified and labeled multiproblem high-risk, smoking high-risk, normative, and low-risk groups. The multiproblem high risk exhibited a constellation of high levels of problem behaviors, including delinquent and sexual behaviors, multiple illicit substance use, and depressive symptoms at age 16. They had risky temperamental attributes and lower academic functioning and educational expectations at age 15.5 and, subsequently, at age 24 completed fewer years of education, and reported lower levels of physical health and higher levels of continued involvement in substance use and abuse. The smoking high-risk group was also found to be at risk for poorer functioning in young adulthood, compared to the low-risk group. The normative and the low risk groups were, by and large, similar in their adolescent and young adult functioning. The continuity and comorbidity path from middle adolescence to young adulthood may be aided and abetted by chronic as well as episodic substance use by adolescents.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 318
页数:28
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Tablan Ofelia C, 2004, MMWR Recomm Rep, V53, P1
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5, V5th ed.
[3]  
Dooley Samuel W., 2008, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V57, P1
[4]   Mixtures of conditional mean- and covariance-structure models [J].
Arminger, G ;
Stein, P ;
Wittenberg, J .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1999, 64 (04) :475-494
[5]   Finite mixtures of covariance structure models with regressors - Loglikelihood function, minimum distance estimation, fit indices, and a complex example [J].
Arminger, G ;
Stein, P .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1997, 26 (02) :148-182
[6]   RECKLESS BEHAVIOR IN ADOLESCENCE - A DEVELOPMENTAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
ARNETT, J .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 1992, 12 (04) :339-373
[7]   Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered [J].
Arnett, JJ .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (05) :317-326
[8]   MODEL-BASED GAUSSIAN AND NON-GAUSSIAN CLUSTERING [J].
BANFIELD, JD ;
RAFTERY, AE .
BIOMETRICS, 1993, 49 (03) :803-821
[9]   The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 9 (01) :3-29
[10]   Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (03) :338-363