Syntactic and lexical features of adolescent L2 students' academic writing

被引:34
作者
Maamuujav, Undarmaa [1 ]
Olson, Carol Booth [1 ]
Chung, Huy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, UCI Writing Project, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
Academic writing; Adolescent L2 students; Syntactic and lexical features; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; COMPLEXITY-MEASURES; QUALITY; LEVEL; SOPHISTICATION; PROFICIENCY; DIVERSITY; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100822
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
With a premium placed on academic writing in the U.S. secondary education context, adolescent L2 students are expected to develop advanced skills to analyze, interpret, and produce complex texts in a variety of content areas, which require proficiency in academic language. To enhance the academic literacy of developing L2 writers and to meet their linguistic needs, it is crucial to identify the unique language features of their academic writing. This study seeks to examine syntactic and lexical features of the text-based analytical essays written by Spanish-speaking L2 students (7th-12th grades) from a public school in a western state of the United States. Employing manual sentence coding and quantitative measures of selected linguistic variables from Coh-Metrix, we analyzed student texts (N = 86) to identify common linguistic patterns and to examine how these linguistic features predict writing quality. Our findings reveal that sentence boundary issues, lack of syntactic variety, the underuse of sophisticated subordination to show connections between ideas, and low use of advanced vocabulary are common in adolescent L2 students' writing. The results of regression analyses show that syntactic complexity and lexical sophistication predict human-judged writing quality. Implications for pedagogy to address the linguistic needs of adolescent L2 students are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
ACT Inc, 2007, WRIT FRAM 2011 NATL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, LANGUAGE SCH FUNCTIO, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410610317
[3]  
Applebee A.N., 2011, ENGL J, V100, P14
[4]  
Beck I. L., 2013, BRINGING WORDS LIFE
[5]  
Bereiter C., 1987, The Psychology of Written Composition
[6]  
Biber D., 2006, University language
[7]   Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development? [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany ;
Poonpon, Kornwipa .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2011, 45 (01) :5-35
[8]   Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity [J].
Bulte, Bram ;
Housen, Alex .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2014, 26 :42-65
[9]  
Bunch G., 2012, Understanding language: Language, literacy, and learning in the content areas
[10]  
Bunch GC., 2019, Amplifying the curriculum: Designing quality learning opportunities for English learners, P21