Agreement of three interpretation systems of intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring by different levels of physicians

被引:2
作者
Pruksanusak, Ninlapa [1 ]
Thongphanang, Putthaporn [1 ]
Chainarong, Natthicha [1 ]
Suntharasaj, Thitima [1 ]
Kor-anantakul, Ounjai [1 ]
Suwanrath, Chitkasaem [1 ]
Petpichetchian, Chusana [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hat Yai 90110, Songkhla, Thailand
关键词
Agreement; intrapartum foetal heart rate; 3-tier system; 5-tier system; interpretation; GUIDELINES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2017.1312314
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
A prospective study was conducted in centre in Southern Thailand, to evaluate agreement in EFM interpretation among various physicians in order to find out the most practical system for daily use. We found strong agreement of very normal FHR tracings among the FIGO, NICHD 3-tier and 5-tier systems. The NICHD 3-tier was more compatible with the FIGO system than 5-tier system. Overall inter-observer agreement was moderate for the NICHD 3-tier system while inter-observer agreement of 5-tier system was fair also the intra-observer agreement was higher in the NICHD 3-tier system. So the 3-tier systems are more suitable than the 5-tier system in general obstetric practice. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject: The 3-tier and 5-tier systems were widely used in general obstetrics practice. What the results of this study add: The inter- and intra-observer agreement of NICHD 3-tier system was higher than the 5-tier system. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: The 3-tier systems were more suitable than the 5-tier systems in general obstetrics practice.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / 999
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography [J].
Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo ;
Spong, Catherine Y. ;
Chandraharan, Edwin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 131 (01) :13-24
[2]   Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability [J].
Chauhan, Suneet P. ;
Klauser, Chad K. ;
Woodring, Thomas C. ;
Sanderson, Maureen ;
Magann, Everett F. ;
Morrison, John C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (06) :623.e1-623.e5
[3]  
Coletta J., 2012, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V206, P226
[4]   Comments on American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin No. 106 [J].
Freeman, Roger K. ;
Nageotte, Michael P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (05) :411-412
[5]   A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns [J].
Garite, TJ ;
Dildy, GA ;
McNamara, H ;
Nageotte, MP ;
Boehm, FH ;
Dellinger, EH ;
Knuppel, RA ;
Porreco, RP ;
Miller, HS ;
Sunderji, S ;
Varner, MW ;
Swedlow, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (05) :1049-1058
[6]  
Gyamfi-Bannerman C, 2011, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V205, P288
[7]   OBSERVATIONS ON HEART RATE AND PH IN HUMAN FETUS DURING LABOR [J].
KUBLI, FW ;
HON, EH ;
KHAZIN, AF ;
TAKEMURA, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1969, 104 (08) :1190-&
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[9]   The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring - Update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines [J].
Macones, George A. ;
Hankins, Gary D. V. ;
Spong, Catherine Y. ;
Hauth, John ;
Moore, Thomas .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (03) :661-666
[10]   A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns [J].
Parer, Julian T. ;
Ikeda, Tomoaki .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (01) :26.e1-26.e6