Optimal Offering and Operating Strategy for a Large Wind-Storage System as a Price Maker

被引:72
作者
Ding, Huajie [1 ,2 ]
Pinson, Pierre [3 ]
Hu, Zechun [1 ]
Wang, Jianhui [1 ,4 ]
Song, Yonghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Elect Engn, State Key Lab Power Syst, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] State Grid Jibei Elect Power Co, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[4] Southern Methodist Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electricity markets; energy storage system; linear decision rules; offering strategy; price-maker strategy; wind farm; POWER; OPTIMIZATION; GENERATION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2681720
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Wind farms and energy storage systems are playing increasingly more important roles in power systems, which makes their offering nonnegligible in some markets. From the perspective of wind farm-energy storage systems (WF-ESS), this paper proposes an integrated strategy of day-ahead offering and real-time operation policies to maximize their overall profit. As participants with large capacity in electricity markets can influence cleared prices by strategic offering, a large scaled WF-ESS is assumed to be a price maker in day-ahead markets. Correspondingly, the strategy considers influence of offering quantity on cleared dayahead prices, and adopts linear decision rules as the real-time control strategy. These allow enhancing overall profits from both dayahead and balancing markets. The integrated price-maker strategy is formulated as a stochastic programming problem, where uncertainty of wind power generation and balancing prices are taken into account in the form of scenario sets, permitting to reformulate the optimization problem as a linear program. Case studies validate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy by highlighting and quantifying benefits comparing with the price-taker strategy, and also show the profit enhancement brought to the distributed resources.
引用
收藏
页码:4904 / 4913
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Strategic Offering for a Wind Power Producer
    Baringo, Luis
    Conejo, Antonio J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (04) : 4645 - 4654
  • [2] Mid-Term Stochastic Scheduling of a Price-Maker Hydro Producer With Pumped Storage
    Baslis, Costas G.
    Bakirtzis, Anastasios G.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (04) : 1856 - 1865
  • [3] Bukhsh W., WIND SCENARIOS DATA
  • [4] An Integrated Multiperiod OPF Model With Demand Response and Renewable Generation Uncertainty
    Bukhsh, Waqquas A.
    Zhang, Chunyu
    Pinson, Pierre
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2016, 7 (03) : 1495 - 1503
  • [5] Optimal operation and hydro storage sizing of a wind-hydro power plant
    Castronuovo, ED
    Lopes, JAP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2004, 26 (10) : 771 - 778
  • [6] Optimal response of an oligopolistic generating company to a competitive pool-based electric power market
    Conejo, AJ
    Contreras, J
    Arroyo, JM
    de la Torre, S
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (02) : 424 - 430
  • [7] Risk Assessment of Virtual Power Plants Offering in Energy and Reserve Markets
    Dabbagh, Saeed Rahmani
    Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad Kazem
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (05) : 3572 - 3582
  • [8] Price maker self-scheduling in a pool-based electricity market: A mixed-integer LP approach
    de la Torre, S
    Arroyo, JM
    Conejo, AJ
    Contreras, J
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (04) : 1037 - 1042
  • [9] Optimal Offering and Operating Strategies for Wind-Storage Systems With Linear Decision Rules
    Ding, Huajie
    Pinson, Pierre
    Hu, Zechun
    Song, Yonghua
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (06) : 4755 - 4764
  • [10] Integrated Bidding and Operating Strategies for Wind-Storage Systems
    Ding, Huajie
    Pinson, Pierre
    Hu, Zechun
    Song, Yonghua
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 7 (01) : 163 - 172