Panel discussion review: session three - issues involved in interpretation of epidemiologic analyses - statistical modeling

被引:33
作者
Bateson, Thomas F. [1 ]
Coull, Brent A. [2 ]
Hubbell, Bryan [3 ]
Ito, Kazuhiko [4 ]
Jerrett, Michael [5 ]
Lumley, Thomas [6 ]
Thomas, Duncan [7 ]
Vedal, Sverre [8 ]
Ross, Mary [9 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Assessment, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] US EPA, Off Air & Radiat, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[4] NYU, Sch Med, Nelson Inst Environm Med, Tuxedo Pk, NY USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Environm Hlth Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Univ So California, Keck Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[9] US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Assessment, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
epidemiology; air pollution; particulate matter; measurement error; confounding; spatial analysis;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jes.7500631
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Clean Air Act mandates that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) develop National Ambient Air Quality Standards for criteria air pollutants and conduct periodic reviews of the standards based on new scientific evidence. In recent reviews, evidence from epidemiologic studies has played a key role. Epidemiologic studies often provide evidence for effects of several air pollutants. Determining whether there are independent effects of the separate pollutants is a challenge. Among the many issues confronting the interpretation of epidemiologic studies of multi-pollutant exposures and health effects are those specifically related to statistical modeling. The EPA convened a workshop on 13 and 14 December 2006 in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, to discuss these and other issues; Session Three of the workshop was devoted specifically to statistical modeling. Prominent statistical modeling issues in epidemiologic studies of air pollution include (1) measurement error across the co-pollutants; (2) correlation and multi-collinearity among the co-pollutants; (3) the timing of the concentration-response function; (4) confounding; and (5) spatial analyses. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily respect the views of policies of the US Environmental Protection Agency.
引用
收藏
页码:S90 / S96
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Focused exposures to airborne traffic particles and heart rate variability in the elderly [J].
Adar, Sara Dubowsky ;
Gold, Diane R. ;
Coull, Brent A. ;
Schwartz, Joel ;
Stone, Peter H. ;
Suh, Helen .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (01) :95-103
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]   THE DISTRIBUTED LAG BETWEEN CAPITAL APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES [J].
ALMON, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 1965, 33 (01) :178-196
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, AIR QUALITY CRITERIA
[5]  
BECKERMAN B, IN PRESS ATMOS ENV
[6]   Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987-2000 [J].
Bell, ML ;
McDermott, A ;
Zeger, SL ;
Samet, JM ;
Dominici, F .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (19) :2372-2378
[7]  
BRANDT S, EPA WORKSH VAL CHILD
[8]   Averting behavior and urban air pollution [J].
Bresnahan, BW ;
Dickie, M ;
Gerking, S .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1997, 73 (03) :340-357
[9]   Association between particulate- and gas-phase components of urban air pollution and daily mortality in eight Canadian cities [J].
Burnett, RT ;
Brook, J ;
Dann, T ;
Delocla, C ;
Philips, O ;
Cakmak, S ;
Vincent, R ;
Goldberg, MS ;
Krewski, D .
INHALATION TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 12 :15-39
[10]   Air pollution effects on myocardial infarction [J].
Cendon, Sonia ;
Pereira, Luiz A. A. ;
Braga, Alfesio L. F. ;
Conceicao, Gleice M. S. ;
Cury Junior, Abraao ;
Romaldini, Helio ;
Lopes, Antonio C. ;
Saldiva, Paulo H. N. .
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2006, 40 (03) :414-419