Sample preparation with solid phase microextraction and exhaustive extraction approaches: Comparison for challenging cases

被引:172
作者
Boyaci, Ezel [1 ]
Rodriguez-Lafuente, Angel [1 ]
Gorynski, Krzysztof [1 ,2 ]
Mirnaghi, Fatemeh [1 ,3 ]
Souza-Silva, Erica A. [1 ]
Hein, Dietmar [4 ]
Pawliszyn, Janusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Chem, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ Torun, Coll Med Bydgoszcz, Dept Pharmacodynam & Mol Pharmacol, PL-85089 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[3] Environm Canada, Emergency Sci & Technol Sect, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3, Canada
[4] PAS Technol, Magdala, Germany
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Sample preparation; On-site/in vivo analysis; Complex matrices/challenging compounds; Solid phase microextraction; Liquid-liquid extraction; Solid phase extraction; CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS-SPECTROMETRY; LIQUID-LIQUID-EXTRACTION; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; THIN-FILM MICROEXTRACTION; QUATERNARY AMMONIUM-COMPOUNDS; POSTMORTEM WHOLE-BLOOD; HOT-WATER EXTRACTION; SPME-GC-MS; GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.aca.2014.12.051
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In chemical analysis, sample preparation is frequently considered the bottleneck of the entire analytical method. The success of the final method strongly depends on understanding the entire process of analysis of a particular type of analyte in a sample, namely: the physicochemical properties of the analytes (solubility, volatility, polarity etc.), the environmental conditions, and the matrix components of the sample. Various sample preparation strategies have been developed based on exhaustive or non-exhaustive extraction of analytes from matrices. Undoubtedly, amongst all sample preparation approaches, liquid extraction, including liquid-liquid (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE), are the most well-known, widely used, and commonly accepted methods by many international organizations and accredited laboratories. Both methods are well documented and there are many well defined procedures, which make them, at first sight, the methods of choice. However, many challenging tasks, such as complex matrix applications, on-site and in vivo applications, and determination of matrix-bound and free concentrations of analytes, are not easily attainable with these classical approaches for sample preparation. In the last two decades, the introduction of solid phase microextraction (SPME) has brought significant progress in the sample preparation area by facilitating on-site and in vivo applications, time weighted average (TWA) and instantaneous concentration determinations. Recently introduced matrix compatible coatings for SPME facilitate direct extraction from complex matrices and fill the gap in direct sampling from challenging matrices. Following introduction of SPME, numerous other microextraction approaches evolved to address limitations of the above mentioned techniques. There is not a single method that can be considered as a universal solution for sample preparation. This review aims to show the main advantages and limitations of the above mentioned sample preparation approaches and the applicability and capability of each technique for challenging cases such as complex matrices, on-site applications and automation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 30
页数:17
相关论文
共 118 条
[91]  
Pawliszyn J., 2009, HDB OF SPME
[92]   Why move analysis from laboratory to on-site? [J].
Pawliszyn, Janusz .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 25 (07) :633-634
[93]   Electrical potential can drive liquid-liquid extraction for sample preparation in chromatography [J].
Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig ;
Rasmussen, Knut Einar .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 27 (10) :934-941
[94]   A multiresidue method with mobile on-site sampling based on SPE for ultratrace analysis of plant protectants in environmental waters [J].
Pittertschatscher, K ;
Inreiter, N ;
Schatzl, A ;
Malissa, H .
FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 365 (04) :338-350
[95]   Contributions of theory to method development in solid-phase extraction [J].
Poole, CF ;
Gunatilleka, AD ;
Sethuraman, R .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2000, 885 (1-2) :17-39
[96]   Comparison of thin-film microextraction and stir bar sorptive extraction for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples with controlled agitation conditions [J].
Qin, Zhipei ;
Bragg, Leslie ;
Ouyang, Gangfeng ;
Pawliszyn, Janusz .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2008, 1196 :89-95
[97]   Solid-phase microextraction under controlled agitation conditions for rapid on-site sampling of organic pollutants in water [J].
Qin, Zhipei ;
Bragg, Leslie ;
Ouyang, Gangfeng ;
Niri, Vadoud H. ;
Pawliszyn, Janusz .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2009, 1216 (42) :6979-6985
[98]   Measurement of Mercury Species in Whole Blood Using Speciated Isotope Dilution Methodology integrated with Microwave-Enhanced Solubilization and Spike Equilibration, Headspace-Solid-Phase Microextraction, and GC-ICP-MS Analysis [J].
Rahman, G. M. Mizanur ;
Wolle, Mesay Mulugeta ;
Fahrenholz, Timothy ;
Kingston, H. M.Skip ;
Pamuku, Matt .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 86 (12) :6130-6137
[99]   Quantitative Analysis of 26 Opioids, Cocaine, and Their Metabolites in Human Blood by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry [J].
Ramirez Fernandez, Maria del Mar ;
Wille, Sarah M. R. ;
Kummer, Nathalie ;
Di Fazio, Vincent ;
Ruyssinckx, Evi ;
Samyn, Nele .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2013, 35 (04) :510-521
[100]   SPME-GC-MS analysis of α-pyrrolidinovaleorophenone in blood in a fatal poisoning case [J].
Saito, Takeshi ;
Namera, Akira ;
Osawa, Motoki ;
Aoki, Hiromichi ;
Inokuchi, Sadaki .
FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 31 (02) :328-332