An experimental study of the effect of the projection ratio and throat-aspect ratio on the efficiency and loss coefficient of a water jet pump

被引:4
作者
Helios, M. P. [1 ,3 ]
Asvapoositkul, W. [2 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Ctr Excellence Energy Technol & Environm CEE, PERDO, Minist Higher Educ Sci Res & Innovat, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Waterjet pump; throat-aspect ratio; projection ratio; efficiency; friction loss coefficient; CAVITATING FLOW; AREA-RATIO; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.15282/jmes.15.3.2021.06.0650
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This study focuses on the influence of dimensionless geometry parameters on the performance and loss coefficient of the throat and diffuser of the water jet pump apparatus. A water jet pump system was designed for a total of nine experimental cases with three different projection ratios (4) and three throat-aspect ratios (Li). The volumetric and pressure ratios - performance parameters are measured at a constant motive pressure and under varying backpressure. The efficiencies of the water jet pump in each configuration were assessed and compared. It was found that increasing 2 or 3 times of projection ratio degrades efficiency about 2% to 5.5%, respectively. Higher projection ratio (L*, > 1) expands the water jet diameter, which clogs the secondary flow. Hence, the changes in L*, > 3 may have a significant impact on efficiency degradation. Shorter 14 may cause the loss of kinetic energy in the diffuser, while longer 14 reduces momentum transfer on the secondary flow. Moreover, the changes in L*., and LI influence friction loss coefficient in the throat and diffuser section, and it reduces with increasing of volumetric ratio. It can be concluded that the appropriate value of projection ratio and throat-aspect ratio plays a role in the kinetic energy dissipation. It is also responsible for the location friction process, at a different volumetric ratio. However, the experimental results denoted the best efficiency and loss coefficient was achieved at a low projection ratio (LX= 1) and small throat-aspect ratios (Lt = 5). The best efficiency of the study was about 23.37%.
引用
收藏
页码:8277 / 8288
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   INVESTIGATION OF EFFECTS OF SCALE AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON EFFICIENCY OF WATER JET PUMPS USING CFD [J].
Aldas, K. ;
Yapici, R. .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2014, 8 (01) :14-25
[2]   LIQUID JET PUMPS FOR 2-PHASE FLOWS [J].
CUNNINGHAM, RG .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1995, 117 (02) :309-316
[3]   GAS COMPRESSION WITH LIQUID JET PUMP [J].
CUNNINGHAM, RG .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1974, 96 (03) :203-215
[4]  
Dandachi J. M. A., 1990, THESIS LOUGHBOROUGH
[5]  
El-Sawaf I. A., 2011, 19 C APPL CLIM, P1
[6]  
ESDU, 2007, 85032 ESDU
[7]  
ESDU, 2011, 93022 ESDU
[8]  
Gaade S. A., 2016, INT J ENG SCI RES TE, V5, P484, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.168433, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.168433]
[9]  
Hammoud A. H., 2006, 4 WSEAS INT C FLUID, P237
[10]  
Hammoud AH., 2006, 4 WSEAS INT C FLUID, P245