Comparison of the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine-Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine-Sufentanil for Liposuction: A Prospective Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Study

被引:7
作者
Wang, Ye [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Wenli [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Weipeng [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Lingxin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Dong [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Xiaoming [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Fuxia [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 33 Ba Da Chu Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, 33 Ba Da Chu Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Sedation; Analgesia; Dexmedetomidine; Remifentanil; Sufentanil; MIDAZOLAM-REMIFENTANIL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; PROPOFOL; PHARMACOKINETICS; ANESTHESIA; GI87084B; AGONISTS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-021-02566-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Dexmedetomidine had sedative and analgesic effects and did not produce significant respiratory depression at therapeutic doses. Aims To compare the sedative and analgesic effects and safety of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil or sufentanil in patients undergoing liposuction. Methods A total of 100 subjects were randomized 1:1 to two groups: Group R and Group S. First, patients were administered midazolam 0.02 mg center dot kg(-1). Anesthesia was induced with an intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 mu g kg(-1) (15 min) and remifentanil 0.1 mu g kg(-1) min(-1) (Group R) or sufentanil 0.1 mu g kg(-1)h(-1) (Group S). Anesthesia was maintained with an intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 1.0 mu g kg(-1)h(-1), midazolam 0.015 mg kg(-1)h(-1), remifentanil 0.1 mu g kg(-1)min(-1) (Group R), or sufentanil 0.1 mu g kg(-1)h(-1) (Group S). Hemodynamic and respiratory changes, modified OAA/S score and BIS values, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale pain scores, satisfaction of the patient and surgical team with the procedure, and adverse events and recovery time were recorded. Results Group R received significantly less midazolam and midazolam per hour compared to Group S (Group R vs. Group S: 3.4 +/- 1.7 mg vs. 5.1 +/- 2.0 mg, P < 0.0001; 1.5 +/- 0.7 mg/h vs. 1.9 +/- 0.6 mg/h, P = 0.002). The incidence of physical or verbal expressions of pain at the start of surgery was significantly lower in Group R compared to Group S (2 [4.3%] vs. 12 [26.7%], P = 0.003). Patient satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in Group R compared to Group S (3.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.3, P < 0.0001). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and dexmedetomidine-sufentanil were effective and safe sedative and analgesic agents for liposuction. Hemodynamic stability was maintained. Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil might be associated with improved analgesic effects compared to dexmedetomidine-sufentanil.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 534
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery [J].
Ahonen, J ;
Olkkola, KT ;
Hynynen, M ;
Seppälä, T ;
Ikävalko, H ;
Remmerie, B ;
Salmenperä, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (04) :533-540
[2]  
Arpaci AH, 2013, J RES MED SCI, V18, P107
[3]  
CHERNIK DA, 1990, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V10, P244
[4]   Improved sedation with dexmedetomidine-remifentanil compared with midazolam-remifentanil during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled trial [J].
Cho, Jin Sun ;
Shim, Jae-Kwang ;
Na, Sungwon ;
Park, Inhye ;
Kwak, Young Lan .
EUROPACE, 2014, 16 (07) :1000-1006
[5]  
Choi EK, 2017, KOREAN J ANESTHESIOL, V70, P299, DOI 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.3.299
[6]   Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy [J].
Early, Dayna S. ;
Lightdale, Jenifer R. ;
Vargo, John J., II ;
Acosta, Ruben D. ;
Chandrasekhara, Vinay ;
Chathadi, Krishnavel V. ;
Evans, John A. ;
Fisher, Deborah A. ;
Fonkalsrud, Lisa ;
Hwang, Joo Ha ;
Khashab, Mouen A. ;
Muthusamy, V. Raman ;
Pasha, Shabana F. ;
Saltzman, John R. ;
Shergill, Amandeep K. ;
Cash, Brooks D. ;
DeWitt, John M. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (02) :327-337
[7]   THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF THE NEW SHORT-ACTING OPIOID REMIFENTANIL (GI87084B) IN HEALTHY ADULT MALE-VOLUNTEERS [J].
EGAN, TD ;
LEMMENS, HJM ;
FISET, P ;
HERMANN, DJ ;
MUIR, KT ;
STANSKI, DR ;
SHAFER, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (05) :881-892
[8]  
Glass PSA, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS7, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00003
[9]   Effect of midazolam on anxiety level and pain perception in cataract surgery with topical anesthesia [J].
Habib, NE ;
Mandour, NM ;
Balmer, HGR .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (02) :437-443
[10]   ALPHA(2) ADRENOCEPTOR AGONISTS AND ANESTHESIA [J].
HAYASHI, Y ;
MAZE, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (01) :108-118