The effects of facial attractiveness and trustworthiness in online peer-to-peer markets

被引:62
作者
Jaeger, Bastian [1 ]
Sleegers, Willem W. A. [1 ]
Evans, Anthony M. [1 ]
Stel, Marielle [2 ]
van Beest, Ilja [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Dept Social Psychol, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Psychol Conflict Risk & Safety, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
First impressions; Peer-to-peer markets; Trustworthiness; Attractiveness; 1ST IMPRESSIONS; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; SOCIAL ATTRIBUTIONS; SHARING ECONOMY; APPEARANCE; JUDGMENTS; ACCURACY; IMAGES; TRUST; SELF;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2018.11.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Online peer-to-peer markets, such as Airbnb, often include profile photos of sellers to reduce anonymity. Ert, Fleischer, and Magen (2016) found that more trustworthy-looking, but not more attractive-looking, Airbnb hosts from Stockholm charge higher prices for similar apartments. This suggests that people are willing to pay more for a night in an apartment if the host looks trustworthy. Here, we present a pre-registered replication testing how photo-based impressions of hosts' attractiveness and trustworthiness influence rental prices. We extend previous investigations by (a) controlling for additional features related to price (e.g., the apartment's location value), (b) testing for an influence of other host features, such as race and facial expression, and (c) analyzing a substantially larger sample of apartments. An analysis of 1,020 listings in New York City showed that more attractive-looking, but not more trustworthy-looking, hosts charge higher prices for their apartments. Compared to White hosts, Black (but not Asian) hosts charge lower prices for their apartments. Hosts who smile more intensely in their profile photo charge higher prices. Our results support the general conclusion that people rely on profile photos in online markets, though we find that attractiveness is more important than trust-worthiness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others
    Abele, Andrea E.
    Wojciszke, Bogdan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 93 (05) : 751 - 763
  • [2] An J, 2016, P 10 AAAI C WEB SOC, V10, P523
  • [3] Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?
    Baumeister, Roy F.
    Vohs, Kathleen D.
    Funder, David C.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (04) : 396 - 403
  • [4] The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success
    Berggren, Niclas
    Jordahl, Henrik
    Poutvaara, Panu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2010, 94 (1-2) : 8 - 15
  • [6] WHAT IS BEAUTIFUL IS GOOD
    DION, K
    WALSTER, E
    BERSCHEID, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (03) : 285 - +
  • [7] Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending
    Duarte, Jefferson
    Siegel, Stephan
    Young, Lance
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2012, 25 (08) : 2455 - 2483
  • [8] WHAT IS BEAUTIFUL IS GOOD, BUT - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON THE PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS STEREOTYPE
    EAGLY, AH
    MAKHIJANI, MG
    ASHMORE, RD
    LONGO, LC
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (01) : 109 - 128
  • [9] Face Value
    Eckel, Catherine C.
    Petrie, Ragan
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (04) : 1497 - 1513
  • [10] Edelman, 2014, DIGITAL DISCRIMINATI, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2377353, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2377353]