Seismic performance of steel moment frames considering the effects of column-base hysteretic behavior and gravity framing system

被引:15
作者
Torres-Rodas, Pablo [1 ]
Flores, Francisco [2 ,3 ]
Pozo, Sebastian [2 ]
Astudillo, Bryam X. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ San Francisco Quito, Coll Sci & Engn, Quito, Ecuador
[2] Univ Cuenca, Dept Civil Engn, Cuenca, Ecuador
[3] Univ Azuay, Dept Civil Engn, Cuenca, Ecuador
关键词
CONNECTIONS; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106654
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents a parametric study conducted on five Steel Moment Frames (SMFs) varying in height (2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 20- story) to assess the interactive effect of the column base hysteretic behavior, continuous gravity columns and partially restrained gravity beam-column connections in their seismic performance. The frame response is examined through sophisticated Nonlinear Time History (NTH) and Nonlinear Static Pushover (NSP) analyses conducted as per FEMAp695 methodology. For each SMF, a range of base connection strengths (and their corresponding rotational stiffnesses) accompanied by different levels of gravity columns rigidity and gravity connection strengths are assigned, resulting in a total of 80 model simulations. Two collapse/failure limit states are formulated for the assessment 1) sidesway collapse defined as per FEMAp695; and 2) column-base connection failure, defined as base rotations exceeding a 0.05 rad threshold. Results from the simulations indicate that the gravity framing system profoundly affects the behavior of the SMFs analyzed by reducing their probability of collapse. In this manner, the seismic demands for the design of column-base connections can be reduced safely, incorporating their high deformation capacity as part of the energy dissipative mechanisms. Potential design implications are discussed, and limitations, as well as lines for future research, are outlined.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
AISC, 2016, SPEC STRUCT STEEL BU
[2]  
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction), 2010, PREQ CONN SPEC INT S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ASCE/SEI 7-16, DOI DOI 10.1061/9780784414248
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Guidelines for nonlinear structural analysis for design of buildings. Part-IIa, DOI DOI 10.6028/NIST.GCR.17-917-46V2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FEMA 350 RECOMMENDED
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, FEMA P695
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SEISMIC DEMANDS NOND
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SEISM PROV STRUCT ST
[9]  
Bruneau M., 2011, Ductile design of steel structures, V2nd
[10]   Effect of Column Base Behavior on Seismic Performance of Multi-Story Steel Moment Resisting Frames [J].
Cui, Yao ;
Wang, Fengzhi ;
Yamada, Satoshi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2019, 19 (01)