Spatial and temporal distribution of soil moisture in drip-irrigated vineyards

被引:21
|
作者
Davenport, Joan R. [1 ]
Stevens, Robert G. [1 ]
Whitley, Kelly M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Ctr Irrigated Agr Res & Extens Ctr, Prosser, WA 99350 USA
关键词
gravimetric soil water; volumetric soil water; plant-available water; regulated deficit irrigation;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI.43.1.229
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
In and and semiarid areas, wine grapes are frequently managed using regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) to control vegetative growth. To understand the distribution of soil moisture using RDI in a drip-irrigated vineyard, we collected soil samples after several irrigation events around six drip emitters in two 'Cabernet Sauvignon' and two 'Merlot' vineyards from late July through Mar. 2002 and 2005. The March sampling depicts soil moisture status before budbreak after winter precipitation. Soil samples were collected in four depth increments at 16 locations in a half-circle radius from immediately below the emitter, to a depth of 60 cm. Both gravimetric and volumetric soil moisture content were determined. Soil moisture varied by depth, distance from the emitter, and sampling time. During late-season irrigation events, 50% to 75% of the sampled area contained plant-available water, which was less than expected. When calculated as plant-available soil moisture, regardless of time of sampling, soil sampled across a 0- to 45-cm depth provided the most representative indication of soil moisture status. Additionally, sampling directly under the emitter or directly under the drip line could result in skewed measurements compared with the sampled area. The data suggest that collecting soil samples within a 20- to 40-cm radius, either diagonal or perpendicular to the drip line emitter position, will best reflect the amount of plant-available soil water. Additionally, monitoring should be conducted on both sides of the row around each emitter selected and then averaged to avoid any patterns from hilling or disruption in water flow patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 235
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Potassium fertigation requirements of drip-irrigated strawberry
    Albregts, EE
    Hochmuth, GJ
    Chandler, CK
    Cornell, J
    Harrison, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1996, 121 (01) : 164 - 168
  • [32] Manipulation of Soil Texture to Remove Salts from a Drip-Irrigated Root Zone
    Berezniak, Arbel
    Ben-Gal, Alon
    Mishael, Yael
    Nachshon, Uri
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2018, 17 (01)
  • [33] A survey of the aeration status of drip-irrigated orchards
    Friedman, S. P.
    Naftaliev, B.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2012, 115 : 132 - 147
  • [34] RESPONSE OF DRIP-IRRIGATED SUGARCANE TO DROUGHT STRESS
    KOEHLER, PH
    MOORE, PH
    JONES, CA
    CRUZ, AD
    MARETZKI, A
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (05) : 906 - 911
  • [35] Root length density and soil water distribution in drip-irrigated olive orchards in Argentina under arid conditions
    Searles, Peter S.
    Saravia, Diego A.
    Rousseaux, M. Cecilia
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2009, 60 (03): : 280 - 288
  • [36] FREQUENCY OF IRRIGATION FOR SUBSURFACE DRIP-IRRIGATED CORN
    CALDWELL, DS
    SPURGEON, WE
    MANGES, HL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1994, 37 (04): : 1099 - 1103
  • [37] NITROGEN APPLICATION FREQUENCY FOR DRIP-IRRIGATED TOMATOES
    COOK, WP
    SANDERS, DC
    HORTSCIENCE, 1991, 26 (03) : 250 - 252
  • [38] Crop coefficients for drip-irrigated processing tomato
    Hanson, BR
    May, DM
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 81 (03) : 381 - 399
  • [39] Nitrogen fertigation requirements of drip-irrigated strawberries
    Hochmuth, GJ
    Albregts, EE
    Chandler, CC
    Cornell, J
    Harrison, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1996, 121 (04) : 660 - 665
  • [40] Movement of the Wetted Front under Drip-irrigated Tomatoes Grown on a Sandy Soil
    Poh, Bee Ling
    Gazula, Aparna
    Simonne, Eric H.
    Hochmuth, Robert C.
    Alligood, Michael R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, VOL 123, 2010, 123 : 175 - 178