A Cost-Sharing Model of Agricultural Disaster Insurance

被引:0
|
作者
Gang Jiatai [1 ]
Li Shujuan [1 ]
Gong Haoran [1 ]
Guo Yuanyuan [1 ]
Fan Guilan [1 ]
Wang Sen [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ, Coll Informat Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH (2014) INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINANCIAL RISK AND CORPORATE FINANCE MANAGEMENT, VOLS. I AND II | 2014年
关键词
Agricultural disaster insurance; One-Sample T Test; AHP; satisfaction degree; Monte Carlo;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
A risk assessment model on agricultural natural disaster insurance is established, taking wheats for example. Firstly, estimate the disaster probability of wheats which suffered from gale, hail, waterlog and frost in each growing season. Secondly, calculate compensation expectations of wheats damaged by different natural disasters by insurance companies under the existing insurance scheme. Thirdly, it is obviously that insurance companies actually run in a loss comparing with the companies' net income in the existing insurance policy. AHP is used to establish a Cost-Sharing Model based on the government, insurance companies and farmers Satisfaction Degree Equation. By solving the equations of satisfaction, getting the tripartite risk ratio under the greatest satisfaction degree are 0.44, 0.19 and 0.37, respectively. And a new insurance scheme is developed. The results indicate that the companies can operate normally when the loss probability is 0.147 under the new scheme, it is to see the new insurance scheme is effective and feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [11] A Hybrid Prediction Model for Damage Warning of Power Transmission Line Under Typhoon Disaster
    Hou, Hui
    Yu, Shiwen
    Wang, Hao
    Xu, Yan
    Xiao, Xiang
    Huang, Yong
    Wu, Xixiu
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 85038 - 85050
  • [12] Study on risk assessment model of coal mine water accident induced by flood disaster
    Qi Q.
    Sun Z.
    Liu W.
    Wang A.
    Yang J.
    Liu S.
    Sun L.
    Wang W.
    Meitan Kexue Jishu/Coal Science and Technology (Peking), 2023, 51 (01): : 395 - 402
  • [13] The research of three kinds of listing cost and appraising model
    Xiao, ZH
    Xu, XP
    Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering (12th), Vols 1- 3, 2005, : 2035 - 2039
  • [14] Model assessment of public–private partnership flood insurance systems: an empirical study of Japan
    Jie Shao
    The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2022, 47 : 79 - 102
  • [15] Evaluating the Knowledge Sharing Performance of the Prince of Songkla University Using a Hybrid MCDM Model
    Thipparate, Thoedtida
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 555 - 562
  • [16] A model of population migration based on Minimum cost and maximum flow
    Chen, Dan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINERY, MATERIALS AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY (ICMMCT 2017), 2017, 126 : 352 - 357
  • [17] Model assessment of public-private partnership flood insurance systems: an empirical study of Japan
    Shao, Jie
    GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2022, 47 (01) : 79 - 102
  • [18] A GIS-based land suitability model for agricultural tractors in CALABARZON Region, Philippines
    Amongo, Rossana Marie
    Saludes, Ronaldo
    Gallegos, Ralph Kristoffer
    Relativo, Patrick Lemuel
    Duminding, Ria Salustia
    Pantano, Adrian Daniel
    Cunan, Julius John Paul
    Lalap-Borja, Gherlee Nelle
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [19] Information sharing, operations capabilities, market intelligence responsiveness and firm performance A moderated mediation model
    Song, Moxi
    Liao, Yuanhong
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 14 (01) : 58 - 78
  • [20] Decision support model to select crop pattern for sustainable agricultural practices using fuzzy MCDM
    Qureshi, Mohamed Rafik N.
    Singh, Ram Karan
    Hasan, Mohd. Abul
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 20 (02) : 641 - 659