MOSFET detectors in quality assurance of tomotherapy treatments

被引:20
|
作者
Cherpak, Amanda [1 ]
Studinski, Ryan C. N. [1 ]
Cygler, Joanna E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Hosp Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
MOSFET detectors; in vivo dosimetry; tomotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The purpose of this work was to characterize metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) in a 6MV conventional linac and investigate their use for quality assurance of radiotherapy treatments with a tomotherapy Hi-Art unit. Materials and methods: High sensitivity and standard sensitivity MOSFETs were first calibrated and then tested for reproducibility, field size dependence, and accuracy of measuring surface dose in a 6 MV beam as well as in a tomotherapy Hi-Art unit. In vivo measurements were performed on both a RANDO phantom and several head and neck cancer patients treated with tomotherapy and compared to TLD measurements and treatment plan doses to evaluate the performance of MOSFETs in a high gradient radiation field. Results: The average calibration factor found was 0.345 +/- 2.5% cGy/mV for the high sensitivity MOSFETs tested and 0.901 +/- 2.4% cGy/mV for the standard sensitivity MOSFETs. MOSFET measured surface doses had an average agreement with ion chamber measurements of 1.55% for the high sensitivity MOSFET and 5.23% for the standard sensitivity MOSFET when averaged over all trials and field sizes tested. No significant dependence on field size was found for the standard sensitivity MOSFETs, however a maximum difference of 5.34% was found for the high sensitivity MOSFET calibration factors in the field sizes tested. Measurements made with MOSFETS on head and neck patients treated on a tomotherapy Hi-Art unit had an average agreement of (3.26 +/- 0.03)% with TLD measurements, however the average of the absolute difference between the MOSFET measurements and the treatment plan skin doses was (12.2 +/- 7.5)%. The MOSFET measured patient skin doses also had good reproducibility, with inter-fraction deviations ranging from 1.4% to 6.6%. Similar results were found from trials using a RANDO phantom. Conclusions: The MOSFETs performed well when used in the tomotherapy Hi-Art unit and did not increase the overall treatment set-up time when used for patient measurements. It was found that MOSFETs are suitable detectors for surface dose measurements in both conventional beam and tomotherapy treatments and they can provide valuable skin dose information in areas where the treatment planning system may not be accurate. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 250
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mosfet detectors in quality assurance of tomotherapy treatments
    Cherpak, A. J.
    Studinski, R. C. N.
    Cygler, J. E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S55 - S55
  • [2] Quality assurance of serial tomotherapy for head and neck patient treatments
    Low, DA
    Chao, KSC
    Mutic, S
    Gerber, RL
    Perez, CA
    Purdy, JA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (03): : 681 - 692
  • [3] Evaluation of film calibration procedures for quality assurance of helical tomotherapy treatments
    James, J
    Nelson, I
    Mackie, T
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1994 - 1994
  • [4] Dosimetry quality assurance of helical tomotherapy treatments, effect of density inhomogeneities
    Tomsej, M.
    Tondeur, V.
    De Patoul, N.
    Vynckier, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S508 - S508
  • [5] Helical tomotherapy quality assurance
    Balog, John
    Soisson, Emilie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (01): : S113 - S117
  • [6] Non-Standard Use of TomoTherapy Exit Imaging Detectors for Quality Assurance Procedures
    Tovmasian, D. A.
    Loginova, A. A.
    Chernyaev, A. P.
    Nechesnyuk, A. V.
    MOSCOW UNIVERSITY PHYSICS BULLETIN, 2021, 76 (06) : 470 - 476
  • [7] Non-Standard Use of TomoTherapy Exit Imaging Detectors for Quality Assurance Procedures
    D. A. Tovmasian
    A. A. Loginova
    A. P. Chernyaev
    A. V. Nechesnyuk
    Moscow University Physics Bulletin, 2021, 76 : 470 - 476
  • [8] TomoTherapy's Exit Detector Data for In vivo Quality Assurance of Head and Neck Treatments
    Goddu, S.
    Rodriguez, V.
    Cates, J.
    Wooten, O.
    Michaletz-Lorenz, M.
    Thorstad, W.
    Gay, H.
    Mutic, S.
    Olivera, G.
    Daniel, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S736 - S737
  • [9] Tomotherapy daily quality assurance phantom
    Jaradat, H
    Paliwal, B
    Mehta, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1989 - 1989
  • [10] Patient quality assurance analysis for tomotherapy
    Papanikolaou, N
    Shi, CY
    Yan, Y
    Weng, X
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1986 - 1986