The ex-situ and in-situ gas diffusivities of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst layer and contribution of primary pores, secondary pores, ionomer and water to the total oxygen diffusion resistance

被引:42
作者
Salari, Sina [1 ]
Tam, Mickey [2 ]
McCague, Claire [2 ]
Stumper, Juergen [2 ]
Bahrami, Majid [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Mechatron Syst Engn, LAEC, 250-13450 102 Ave, Surrey, BC V3T 0A3, Canada
[2] Automot Fuel Cell Cooperat Corp, Struct Properties & Performance Res Div, 9000 Glenlyon Pkwy, Burnaby, BC V5J 5J8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
PEM fuel cells; Catalyst layer; Ex-situ gas diffusivity; In-situ gas diffusivity; Ionomer-water diffusion resistance; TRANSPORT RESISTANCE; RECONSTRUCTION; COEFFICIENT; CONDUCTIVITY; PHASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227479
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Oxygen transfer resistance in catalyst layer (CL) of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) is the limiting factor under high current density operation. The gas diffusivity of the CL has been studied ex-situ and in-situ in the literature, however, an order of magnitude difference between values of ex-situ and in-situ diffusivities and contribution of pores, ionomer and water to the total mass transfer are yet remain to be investigated. In this study ex-situ and in-situ gas diffusion of ten different CL designs are measured. The ex-situ measured resistance is a part of the total resistance measured in-situ, and having that, the constituting parts of total diffusion may be obtained. The diffusion resistance of ionomer-water accounts for about 80% of the total resistance, and the rest is almost all due to secondary pores. Although, primary pores' direct contribution to the diffusion resistance is negligible, their size has a notable impact on the ionomer-water relative diffusivity and increasing their diameter can linearly increase the ionomer-water diffusivity. Moreover, porosity of CL affects ionomer-water diffusivity by power of three. This study shows the efforts to reduce the total oxygen diffusion resistance should focus on increasing the CL porosity and size of primary pores.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Measurement of Oxygen Transport Resistance in PEM Fuel Cells by Limiting Current Methods [J].
Baker, Daniel R. ;
Caulk, David A. ;
Neyerlin, Kenneth C. ;
Murphy, Michael W. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 156 (09) :B991-B1003
[2]   Determination of the effective gas diffusivity of a porous composite medium from the three-dimensional reconstruction of its microstructure [J].
Berson, Arganthael ;
Choi, Hae-Won ;
Pharoah, Jon G. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 83 (02)
[4]   Insights into the role of wettability in cathode catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell; pore scale immiscible flow and transport processes [J].
Fathi, H. ;
Raoof, A. ;
Mansouri, S. H. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2017, 349 :57-67
[5]  
Francoise R., 1999, ADSORPTION POWDERS P
[6]   Capillary condensation of adsorbates in porous materials [J].
Horikawa, Toshihide ;
Do, D. D. ;
Nicholson, D. .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2011, 169 (01) :40-58
[7]   Effective-Diffusivity Measurement of Partially-Saturated Fuel-Cell Gas-Diffusion Layers [J].
Hwang, G. S. ;
Weber, A. Z. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 159 (11) :F683-F692
[8]   Theoretical examination of effective oxygen diffusion coefficient and electrical conductivity of polymer electrolyte fuel cell porous components [J].
Inoue, Gen ;
Yokoyama, Kouji ;
Ooyama, Junpei ;
Terao, Takeshi ;
Tokunaga, Tomomi ;
Kubo, Norio ;
Kawase, Motoaki .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2016, 327 :610-621
[9]   Effect of porous structure of catalyst layer on effective oxygen diffusion coefficient in polymer electrolyte fuel cell [J].
Inoue, Gen ;
Kawase, Motoaki .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2016, 327 :1-10
[10]   Effective diffusivity of polymer electrolyte fuel cell gas diffusion layers: An overview and numerical study [J].
Ismail, M. S. ;
Ingham, D. B. ;
Hughes, K. J. ;
Ma, L. ;
Pourkashanian, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (34) :10994-11010