Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol

被引:8
|
作者
Quasdorf, Tina [1 ,2 ]
Clack, Lauren [3 ]
Laporte Uribe, Franziska [1 ,2 ]
Holle, Daniela [4 ]
Berwig, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Purwins, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Schultes, Marie-Therese [3 ]
Roes, Martina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Zentrum Neurodegenerat Erkrankungen eV DZ, Witten, Germany
[2] Univ Witten, Dept Pflegewissensch, Fak Gesundheit, Witten, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Implementat Sci Hlth Care, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Hsch Gesundheit, Dept Pflegewissensch, Bochum, Germany
关键词
Process evaluation; Frameworks; Models; Theory; Complex intervention; Implementation; Health care; Systematic scoping review; GLOSSARY;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-021-01825-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Complex interventions in health care are characterized by multiple interacting components as well as by numerous nonlinear interactions with the social systems within which they are being implemented. The process of developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions is therefore challenging. Established guidance such as the MRC (Medical Research Council) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions refers to process evaluations as an integral part of the development of complex evidence-based interventions. Even though the need for process evaluations is recognized, the realization of such approaches is challenging because methodological instruction is sparse, and the phenomenon of interest is complex. A number of theoretical approaches indicating how to conduct process evaluations of complex interventions in health care exist, but a systematic and comprehensive overview of these is missing. Thus, the objective of the systematic scoping review described herein is to provide an overview and analysis of theoretical approaches suitable for the planning and conducting of process evaluations. Methods The design and conduct of this review will follow the procedures of a systematic scoping review. The search strategy will be developed following the BeHEMoTh (Behaviour of interest; Health context; Exclusions; Models or Theories) template which has been conceptualized for structured reviews of theory. The systematic search of the MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL (via EBSCO) and PsycInfo (via EBSCO) electronic databases will be complemented by "hand searching" techniques. Study selection, data extraction, and data analysis will be performed by tandems of two researchers independently of each other. Divergent decisions and judgements between the two researchers will be discussed by the whole review team. Discussion The findings from this scoping review will provide an overview and comparison of theoretical approaches suitable for process evaluations of complex interventions in health care. The review results will support researchers in choosing the theoretical approach that best fits the respective focus of their process evaluation study. Systematic review registration This study has been registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under registration number .
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Theoretical approaches to process evaluations of complex interventions in health care: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Tina Quasdorf
    Lauren Clack
    Franziska Laporte Uribe
    Daniela Holle
    Martin Berwig
    Daniel Purwins
    Marie-Therese Schultes
    Martina Roes
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [2] Process Evaluations for the Scale-Up of Complex Interventions - a Scoping Review
    Rathod, Lekha
    Heine, Martin
    Boateng, Daniel
    Martens, Monika
    VAN Olmen, Josefien
    Ku, Grace marie
    Klipstein-grobusch, Kerstin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2024, 24 (04): : 1 - 13
  • [3] Examining the use of process evaluations of randomised controlled trials of complex interventions addressing chronic disease in primary health care-a systematic review protocol
    Liu H.
    Muhunthan J.
    Hayek A.
    Hackett M.
    Laba T.-L.
    Peiris D.
    Jan S.
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [4] Economic evaluations of health care interventions in oropharyngeal dysphagia after stroke: protocol for a systematic review
    Marin, Sergio
    Serra-Prat, Mateu
    Ortega, Omar
    Clave, Pere
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [5] Economic evaluations of health care interventions in oropharyngeal dysphagia after stroke: protocol for a systematic review
    Sergio Marin
    Mateu Serra-Prat
    Omar Ortega
    Pere Clavé
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [6] Mapping the evidence on health equity considerations in economic evaluations of health interventions: a scoping review protocol
    Hafizah Besar Sa’aid
    Sharon Mathew
    Marina Richardson
    Joanna M. Bielecki
    Beate Sander
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [7] Mapping the evidence on health equity considerations in economic evaluations of health interventions: a scoping review protocol
    Sa'aid, Hafizah Besar
    Mathew, Sharon
    Richardson, Marina
    Bielecki, Joanna M.
    Sander, Beate
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [8] Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review
    Baghbanian, Abdolvahab
    Merlin, Tracy
    Carter, Drew
    Wang, Shuhong
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [9] A protocol for a systematic review of process evaluations of interventions investigating sedentary behaviour in adults
    Corepal, Rekesh
    Hall, Jessica Faye
    English, Coralie
    Farrin, Amanda
    Fitzsimons, Claire F.
    Forster, Anne
    Lawton, Rebecca
    Mead, Gillian
    Clarke, David
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [10] Process evaluations of primary care interventions addressing chronic disease: a systematic review
    Liu, Hueiming
    Mohammed, Alim
    Shanthosh, Janani
    News, Madeline
    Laba, Tracey-Lea
    Hackett, Maree L.
    Peiris, David
    Jan, Stephen
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):