Impact of waiting on the perception of service quality in nuclear medicine

被引:12
作者
De Man, S
Vlerick, P
Gemmel, P
De Bondt, P
Matthys, D
Dierckx, RA
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Econ & Business Adm, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Paediat & Genet, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Ghent Univ Hosp, Div Nucl Med, Ghent, Belgium
[5] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
waiting times; service quality;
D O I
10.1097/00006231-200506000-00010
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background This is the first study examining the link between waiting and various dimensions of perceived service quality in nuclear medicine. Methods We tested the impact of selected waiting experience variables on the evaluation of service quality, measured using the Servqual tool, of 406 patients in nuclear medicine, with objective and subjective waiting times as co-variates. The sequence of events in service delivery in nuclear medicine (waiting time before injection, waiting time before scanning and total waiting time) is taken into account. Results Patients underestimated the waiting time before injection and the total waiting time, while overestimated the waiting time before scanning. Our results show that the total subjective waiting time has more impact on the reliability dimension (R-2 adj=0.148) than on the other service quality dimensions of Servqual. Providing information about the reasons for delay had a significant main effect on the perception of reliability (F=9.64, P=0.02). Conclusions The study stresses the importance of explaining the causes for delay to increase patients' perceptions of reliability of the nuclear medicine department and contains several findings that should assist service managers to formulate more effective waiting perception strategies. Nucl Med Commun 26:541-547 (c) 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 547
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Baker J., 1996, Journal of the Academy ofMarketing Science, V24, P338, DOI DOI 10.1177/0092070396244005
[2]  
Barlow G. L., 2002, MANAGERIAL AUDITING, V17, P397, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02686900210437507, 10.1108/02686900210437507]
[3]  
BEQIRI MS, 2002, DEC SCI I ANN M P, P2155
[4]   EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SATISFACTION - WHAT MATTERS MOST [J].
BURSCH, B ;
BEEZY, J ;
SHAW, R .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (03) :586-591
[5]   The effects of music, wait-length evaluation, and mood on a low-cost wait experience [J].
Cameron, MA ;
Baker, J ;
Peterson, M ;
Braunsberger, K .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2003, 56 (06) :421-430
[6]  
CARMAN JM, 1990, J RETAILING, V66, P33
[7]   IMPACT OF WAITING ATTRIBUTION AND CONSUMERS MOOD ON PERCEIVED QUALITY [J].
CHEBAT, JC ;
FILIATRAULT, P ;
GELINASCHEBAT, C ;
VANINSKY, A .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1995, 34 (03) :191-196
[8]   MEASURING SERVICE QUALITY - A REEXAMINATION AND EXTENSION [J].
CRONIN, JJ ;
TAYLOR, SA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1992, 56 (03) :55-68
[9]  
Dansky KH, 1997, HOSP HEALTH SERV ADM, V42, P165
[10]   How disconfirmation, perception and actual waiting times impact customer satisfaction [J].
Davis, MM ;
Heineke, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICE INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT, 1998, 9 (01) :64-+