Friend or foe? The effects of patent attorney use on filing strategy vis-a-vis the effects of firm experience

被引:19
作者
Suezeroglu-Melchiors, Sevim [1 ]
Gassmann, Oliver [2 ]
Palmie, Maximilian [2 ]
机构
[1] Dennemeyer Consulting GmbH, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
Patents; Filing strategy; Intellectual property management; IP intermediaries; Patent attorney; Patent strategies; Strategic IP management; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; INDUSTRY; MARKET; PERFORMANCE; DETERMINANTS; PROTECTION; CITATIONS;
D O I
10.1108/MD-01-2016-0047
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - In the intellectual property (IP) and management literature, the question of how external patent attorneys impact patent filings has been understudied. The purpose of this paper is to advance this area of research by examining how the use of external patent attorneys influences the patent filing strategies of firms and what impact firms' level of experience with the exclusive use of in-house resources has on filing strategies. This study, thus, provides insights into the strategic dimension behind patent filing, a process which is affected by patent attorneys' work and decision-making processes. Design/methodology/approach - The econometric analysis is based on a patent database of 922,553 patents which is combined with an EPO patent database covering applications from 1990 to 2010. The authors test the hypotheses for this study using patent indicators addressing the impact of in-house firm experience vs the use of external patent attorneys on firm's filing strategy. Findings - This research finds empirical evidence that external patent attorneys' work has an effect on patent scope, international scope, and patenting speed. Moreover, it can be shown that external patent attorneys have a positive impact on most filing dimensions, such as patent scope, international scope and the Patent Cooperation Treaty option, whereas the level of in-house firm experience has a negative impact on most filing dimensions. This implies that external patent attorneys seem to pursue a "maximization approach" while experienced firms seem to pursue a more differentiated approach to filing patents, for instance, drafting narrower and more focused patents. Practical implications - The study suggests that effective filing strategies require an integrated approach between diverse IP stakeholders. More particularly, filing strategies should be communicated and aligned between all actors, including external patent attorneys in order to achieve the targeted patenting output. Originality/value - The current study develops a patent filing typology, which accounts for patent attorneys' decision options. In providing insights into patent attorneys' work and their impacts on intellectual property rights management, the study is a useful complement to prior research, which has predominantly focused on applicants or examiners.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1142
页数:21
相关论文
共 83 条
[61]   Towards an attention-based view of technology decisions [J].
Palmie, Maximilian ;
Lingens, Bernhard ;
Gassmann, Oliver .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2016, 46 (04) :781-796
[62]   Coordination mechanisms for international innovation in SMEs: effects on time-to-market and R&D task complexity as a moderator [J].
Palmie, Maximilian ;
Zeschky, Marco ;
Winterhalter, Stephan ;
Sauter, Philipp Walter ;
Haefner, Naomi ;
Gassmann, Oliver .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2016, 46 (02) :273-294
[63]   Patent portfolios [J].
Parchomovsky, G ;
Wagner, RP .
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 2005, 154 (01) :1-77
[64]   INNOVATION CYCLES AND LEARNING AT THE PATENT OFFICE: DOES THE EARLY PATENT GET THE DELAY? [J].
Regibeau, Pierre ;
Rockett, Katharine .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 58 (02) :222-246
[65]   Improving patent valuations for management purposes - validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales [J].
Reitzig, M .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (6-7) :939-957
[66]  
Reitzig M., 2009, PATENT GRANT SUCCESS
[67]   VALUE APPROPRIATION AS AN ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITY: THE CASE OF IP PROTECTION THROUGH PATENTS [J].
Reitzig, Markus ;
Puranam, Phanish .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (07) :765-789
[68]  
Rich G. S., 1959, G WASHINGTON LAW REV, V28, P393
[69]  
Ruston DA, 1996, 1996 CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING - CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I AND II, P911, DOI 10.1109/CCECE.1996.548301
[70]  
Schankerman, 1999, 7345 NAT BUR EC RES