Coelacanths as "almost living fossils"

被引:34
作者
Cavin, Lionel [1 ]
Guinot, Guillaume [1 ]
机构
[1] Museum Hist Nat, Dept Geol & Paleontol, 1 Rue Malagnou,CP6434, CH-1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
coelacanths; tetrapods; ray-finned fishes; fossil record; morphological disparity;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2014.00049
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Since its usage by Darvvir (18591, the concept of "living fossil" has undergone multiple definitions and has been much discussed and criticized. Soon after its discovery in 1938, the coelacanth Latimeria was regarded as the iconic example of a "living fossil." Several morphological studies have shown that the coelacanth lineage (Actinistia) has not displayed critical morphological transformation during its evolutionary history and molecular studies have revealed a low substitution rate for Latimeria, indicating a slow genetic evolution. This statement, however, has been recently questioned by arguing that the low substitution rate was not real, and that the slow morphological evolution of actinistians was not supported by paleontological evidence. The assessment of morphological transformation among three vertebrate lineages during a time interval of circa 400 million years shows that the morphological disparity of coelacanths is much more reduced than the morphological disparity of Actinopterygii and Tetrapoda. These results support the idea that living coelacanths are singular organisms among the living world.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Mitogenome sequencing reveals shallow evolutionary histories and recent divergence time between morphologically and ecologically distinct European whitefish (Coregonus spp.) [J].
Jacobsen, Magnus W. ;
Hansen, Michael M. ;
Orlando, Ludovic ;
Bekkevold, Dorte ;
Bernatchez, Louis ;
Willerslev, Eske ;
Gilbert, M. Thomas P. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2012, 21 (11) :2727-2742
[12]   FURTHER STUDIES BASED ON UNIQUELY DERIVED CHARACTER CONCEPT [J].
LEQUESNE, WJ .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1972, 21 (03) :281-&
[13]   Classifications and other ordering systems [J].
Mayr, E ;
Bock, WJ .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (04) :169-194
[14]   THE PHYLOGENETIC SIGNIFICANCE OF BONE TYPES IN EUTELEOST FISHES [J].
PARENTI, LR .
ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1986, 87 (01) :37-51
[15]   Tree thinking, time and topology: comments on the interpretation of tree diagrams in evolutionary/phylogenetic systematics [J].
Podani, Janos .
CLADISTICS, 2013, 29 (03) :315-327
[16]   The series, the network, and the tree: changing metaphors of order in nature [J].
Rieppel, Olivier .
BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2010, 25 (04) :475-496
[17]   RATES OF EVOLUTION IN THE COELACANTH AND DIPNOAN FISHES [J].
SCHAEFFER, B .
EVOLUTION, 1952, 6 (01) :101-111
[18]  
Schultze Hans-Peter, 2004, P463
[19]  
Schultze HP, 2001, SYST ASSOC SPEC VOL, V61, P315
[20]   Origin and evolution of the integumentary skeleton in non-tetrapod vertebrates [J].
Sire, Jean-Yves ;
Donoghue, Philip C. J. ;
Vickaryous, Matthews K. .
JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2009, 214 (04) :409-440