Does energy poverty matter for gender inequality? Global evidence

被引:69
作者
Canh Phuc Nguyen [1 ]
Thanh Dinh Su [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Sch Publ Finance, 59C Nguyen Dinh Chieu,Dist 3, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
关键词
Gender inequality; Energy poverty; Access to electricity; Clean energy services; INCOME INEQUALITY; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PANEL-DATA; ELECTRICITY; ACCESS; IMPACTS; GROWTH; CHINA; EMPOWERMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.esd.2021.07.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Gender inequality has improved slightly over recent decades, but it is still a critical issue across the globe, especially in developing countries. This study investigates the influence of energy poverty reduction on gender inequality, using a sample of 51 developing countries from 2002 to 2017 and considering four dimensions: employment, health, education, and socio-political-economic rights. By applying a two-step system generalised method of moments estimator to deal with endogeneity, the results are shown to be statistically robust. Reduction in energy poverty appears to increase employment opportunities for women, especially in industry and service sectors, which results in an improvement in the number of female wage and salaried workers in comparison with their male counterparts. Energy poverty reduction is also found to re-balance gender inequality in health indicators. Notably, reduced energy poverty is an influential factor in gender equality in education and socioeconomic rights. The results are checked for robustness by five different proxies of energy poverty reduction and different estimate strategies. Based on these findings, the governments of developing countries should focus principally on alleviating energy poverty as the first and most crucial policy to curb gender inequality. (C) 2021 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 45
页数:11
相关论文
共 111 条
[51]  
Kripfganz S., 2017, German Stata Users Group Meetings 2017 (No. 03)
[52]   Does the coronavirus pandemic level the gender inequality curve? (It doesn't) [J].
Kristal, Tali ;
Yaish, Meir .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND MOBILITY, 2020, 68
[53]  
Kuznets S, 1955, AM ECON REV, V45, P1
[54]   The quality of government [J].
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-De-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A ;
Vishny, R .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 1999, 15 (01) :222-279
[55]   Is energy security a driver for economic growth? Evidence from a global sample [J].
Le, Thai-Ha ;
Canh Phuc Nguyen .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 :436-451
[56]   Measuring fuel poverty in France: Which households are the most fuel vulnerable? [J].
Legendre, Berangere ;
Ricci, Olivia .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 49 :620-628
[57]   Does gender inequality affect household green consumption behaviour in China? [J].
Li, Jiajia ;
Zhang, Jian ;
Zhang, Dayong ;
Ji, Qiang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 135
[59]   Men, Muslims, and Attitudes toward Gender Inequality [J].
Lussier, Danielle N. ;
Fish, M. Steven .
POLITICS AND RELIGION, 2016, 9 (01) :29-60
[60]   Capturing the multifaceted nature of energy poverty: Lessons from Belgium [J].
Meyer, Sandrine ;
Laurence, Holzemer ;
Bart, Delbeke ;
Lucie, Middlemiss ;
Kevin, Marechal .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 40 :273-283