On the Energy Consumption and Ranging Accuracy of Ultra-Wideband Physical Interfaces

被引:8
作者
Flueratoru, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Wehrli, Silvan [3 ]
Magno, Michele [4 ]
Niculescu, Dragos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politehn Bucuresti, Comp Sci Dept, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Tampere Univ, Elect Engn Unit, Tampere, Finland
[3] 3db Access AG, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
2020 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM) | 2020年
关键词
Ultra-Wideband (UWB); Distance Measurement; Accuracy; Energy Efficiency; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9347984
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Ultra-wideband (UWB) communication is attracting increased interest for its high-accuracy distance measurements. However, the typical current consumption of tens to hundreds of mA during transmission and reception might make the technology prohibitive to battery-powered devices in the Internet of Things. The IEEE 802.15.4 standard specifies two UWB physical layer interfaces (PHYs), with low- and high-rate pulse repetition (LRP and HRP, respectively). While the LRP PHY allows a more energy-efficient implementation of the UWB transceiver than its HRP counterpart, the question is whether some ranging quality is lost in exchange. We evaluate the trade-off between power and energy consumption, on the one hand, and distance measurement accuracy and precision, on the other hand, using UWB devices developed by Decawave (HRP) and 3db Access (LRP). We find that the distance measurement errors of 3db Access devices have at most 12 cm higher bias and standard deviation in line-of-sight propagation and 2-3 times higher spread in non-line-of-sight scenarios than those of Decawave devices. However, 3db Access chips consume 10 times less power and 125 times less energy per distance measurement than Decawave ones. Since the LRP PHY has an ultra-low energy consumption, it should be preferred over the HRP PHY when energy efficiency is critical, with a small penalty in the ranging performance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DW1000 DAT VERS 2 09
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, IEEE 802.15.4
[3]  
[Anonymous], RANG DEM US GUID UND
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Ultra-wideband Positioning Systems
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, IEEE Standard 802.15.4
[6]  
[Anonymous], DW1000 US MAN VERS 2
[7]  
Arslan H., 2006, Ultra Wideband Wireless Communication
[8]  
F. C. Commission, 2002, 0248 FCC
[9]   Localization via ultra-wideband radios [J].
Gezici, S ;
Tian, Z ;
Giannakis, GB ;
Kobayashi, H ;
Molisch, AF ;
Poor, HV ;
Sahinoglu, Z .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2005, 22 (04) :70-84
[10]   SnapLoc: An Ultra-Fast UWB-Based Indoor Localization System for an Unlimited Number of Tags [J].
Grosswindhager, Bernhard ;
Stocker, Michael ;
Rath, Michael ;
Boano, Carlo Alberto ;
Roemer, Kay .
IPSN '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION PROCESSING IN SENSOR NETWORKS, 2019, :61-72