Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review

被引:486
作者
Burke, Matthew J. [1 ]
Stephens, Jennie C. [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Macdonald Campus,21,111 Lakeshore Rd, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ H9X 3V9, Canada
[2] Northeastern Univ, Global Resilience Inst, Sch Publ Policy & Urban Affairs, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Distributed power; Energy democracy; Energy politics; Renewable energy transition; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; TRANSFORMING POWER; DEMOCRACY; POLICY; TECHNOLOGY; GOVERNANCE; ECONOMY; STATE; DECENTRALIZATION; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Inspired by the energy democracy movement, this conceptual review critically explores relationships between concentrated or distributed renewable energy and political power. Advocates assert that because the renewable energy transition is fundamentally a political struggle, efforts to shift from fossil fuels and decarbonize societies will not prove effective without confronting and destabilizing dominant systems of energy power. The objectives of this paper include: 1) theorizing and exploring the relationships between renewable energy and political power, 2) critically assessing tensions associated with an energy democracy agenda, and 3) drawing out the implications for democratizing renewable energy development in practice. Distributed energy-politics posits that distributed energy sources and technologies enable and organize distributed political power and vice versa. Efforts are underway to find ways to re-organize distributed energy flows into aggregated and concentrated stocks of energy and other forms of political power. More democratic renewable energy futures may benefit from strengthening democratic practices and outcomes, extending democratization of energy systems across all components, stages and end uses, and sharpening positions relative to dominant pressures of capitalism and market ideology, the ideology of unlimited growth, and the modernist/industrialist agenda. Renewable energy systems offer a possibility but not a certainty for more democratic energy futures.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 93
页数:16
相关论文
共 146 条
  • [11] Beebe A., 2017, SMALL DISTRIBUTED SO
  • [12] The governance of unsustainability: ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn
    Bluehdorn, Ingolfur
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 22 (01) : 16 - 36
  • [13] Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions
    Boonstra, Wiebren J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (01):
  • [14] Energopower: An Introduction
    Boyer, Dominic
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2014, 87 (02) : 309 - 333
  • [15] Boyer Dominic., 2011, Anthropology News, V52, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1556-3502.2011.52505.x
  • [16] Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy
    Bridge, Gavin
    Bouzarovski, Stefan
    Bradshaw, Michael
    Eyre, Nick
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 53 : 331 - 340
  • [17] Bronin S. C., 2010, CONN LAW REV, V43
  • [18] The Transforming Power of Democracy: Regime Type and the Distribution of Electricity
    Brown, David S.
    Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2009, 103 (02) : 193 - 213
  • [19] Bues Andrea., 2016, Conceptualizing Germany's Energy Transition, P69, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-50593-4_5
  • [20] Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions
    Burke, Matthew J.
    Stephens, Jennie C.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 33 : 35 - 48