Elastography for the Characterization of Breast Lesions: Initial Clinical Experience

被引:54
作者
Kumm, Todd R. [1 ]
Szabunio, Margaret M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Diagnost Imaging Program, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107327481001700303
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: While breast biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of suspicious lesions, a large proportion of biopsy specimens reveal a benign result. Therefore, a noninvasive and reliable method to identify low-risk lesions would be a valuable tool. Methods: We assessed the application and diagnostic performance of elastography for the characterization of breast lesions in patients referred for biopsy. Subjects referred for ultrasound-guided biopsy of sonographically apparent breast lesions were included in this study. The Hitachi Hi-Vision 900 ultrasound was used to generate index test results for elastography scoring (ES) and for strain ratio (SR) measurement. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined using pathologic results from 14-gauge core needle biopsy as the reference standard. Results: A total of 310 lesions in 288 patients were included in this series. Of these 310 lesions, 223 (72%) were benign and 87 (28%) were malignant. Sensitivity was 0.76 for ES and 0.79 for SR. Specificity was 0.81 for ES and 0.76 for SR. Positive predictive value was 0.60 for ES and 0.57 for SR. Negative predictive value was 0.90 for ES and 0.90 for SR. SR values for malignant lesions were significantly higher (median ratios 10.5 and 2.7, respectively, P < .001). Conclusions: While the initial clinical performance of elastography imaging shows potential to reduce biopsy of low-risk lesions, a large-scale trial addressing appropriate patient selection, diagnostic parameters, and practical application of this technique is necessary prior to widespread clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 161
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Elastography of breast lesions: Initial clinical results
    Garra, BS
    Cespedes, EI
    Ophir, J
    Spratt, SR
    Zuurbier, RA
    Magnant, CM
    Pennanen, MF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [2] Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions:: Clinical results
    Hiltawsky, KM
    Krüger, M
    Starke, C
    Heuser, L
    Ermert, H
    Jensen, A
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 27 (11) : 1461 - 1469
  • [3] BI-RADS for sonography: Positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features
    Hong, AS
    Rosen, EL
    Soo, MS
    Baker, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 1260 - 1265
  • [4] Breast disease: Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis
    Itoh, A
    Ueno, E
    Tohno, E
    Kamma, H
    Takahashi, H
    Shiina, T
    Yamakawa, M
    Matsumura, T
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) : 341 - 350
  • [5] Cancer statistics, 2008
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Ward, Elizabeth
    Hao, Yongping
    Xu, Jiaquan
    Murray, Taylor
    Thun, Michael J.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2008, 58 (02) : 71 - 96
  • [6] Screening mammography: Costs and use of screening-related services
    Poplack, SP
    Carney, PA
    Weiss, JE
    Titus-Ernstoff, L
    Goodrich, ME
    Tosteson, ANA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [7] Schaefer F., 2009, EUR J RADIOL
  • [8] Elastography of the breast: a prospective study of 122 lesions
    Tardivon, A.
    El Khoury, C.
    Thibault, F.
    Wyler, A.
    Barreau, B.
    Neuenschwander, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (05): : 657 - 662
  • [9] Breast tumor classification using axial shear strain elastography: a feasibility study
    Thitaikumar, Arun
    Mobbs, Louise M.
    Kraemer-Chant, Christina M.
    Garra, Brian S.
    Ophir, Jonathan
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (17) : 4809 - 4823
  • [10] Real-time elastography -: an advanced method of ultrasound:: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions
    Thomas, A.
    Fischer, T.
    Frey, H.
    Ohlinger, R.
    Grunwald, S.
    Blohmer, J. -U.
    Winzer, K. -J.
    Weber, S.
    Kristiansen, G.
    Ebert, B.
    Kuemmel, S.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 28 (03) : 335 - 340