Analysis of force-deconvolution methods in frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy

被引:30
作者
Welker, Joachim [1 ]
Illek, Esther [1 ]
Giessibl, Franz J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Inst Expt & Appl Phys, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
来源
BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF NANOTECHNOLOGY | 2012年 / 3卷
关键词
frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy; force deconvolution; numerical implementation; SPECTROSCOPY; SHIFTS;
D O I
10.3762/bjnano.3.27
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
In frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy the direct observable is the frequency shift of an oscillating cantilever in a force field. This frequency shift is not a direct measure of the actual force, and thus, to obtain the force, deconvolution methods are necessary. Two prominent methods proposed by Sader and Jarvis (Sader-Jarvis method) and Giessibl (matrix method) are investigated with respect to the deconvolution quality. Both methods show a nontrivial dependence of the deconvolution quality on the oscillation amplitude. The matrix method exhibits spikelike features originating from a numerical artifact. By interpolation of the data, the spikelike features can be circumvented. The Sader-Jarvis method has a continuous amplitude dependence showing two minima and one maximum, which is an inherent property of the deconvolution algorithm. The optimal deconvolution depends on the ratio of the amplitude and the characteristic decay length of the force for the Sader-Jarvis method. However, the matrix method generally provides the higher deconvolution quality.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 248
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Abramowitz M., 1972, National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series, V55
  • [2] Data acquisition and analysis procedures for high-resolution atomic force microscopy in three dimensions
    Albers, Boris J.
    Schwendemann, Todd C.
    Baykara, Mehmet Z.
    Pilet, Nicolas
    Liebmann, Marcus
    Altman, Eric I.
    Schwarz, Udo D.
    [J]. NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 20 (26)
  • [3] FREQUENCY-MODULATION DETECTION USING HIGH-Q CANTILEVERS FOR ENHANCED FORCE MICROSCOPE SENSITIVITY
    ALBRECHT, TR
    GRUTTER, P
    HORNE, D
    RUGAR, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1991, 69 (02) : 668 - 673
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, MATLAB R2010B
  • [5] ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE
    BINNIG, G
    QUATE, CF
    GERBER, C
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1986, 56 (09) : 930 - 933
  • [6] Custance O, 2009, NANOSCI TECHNOL, V2, P31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-01495-6_3
  • [7] Dürig U, 2000, APPL PHYS LETT, V76, P1203, DOI 10.1063/1.125983
  • [8] Interaction sensing in dynamic force microscopy
    Dürig, U
    [J]. NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2000, 2 : 51 - 512
  • [9] Physical interpretation of frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy
    Giessibl, FJ
    Bielefeldt, H
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2000, 61 (15): : 9968 - 9971
  • [10] Advances in atomic force microscopy
    Giessibl, FJ
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2003, 75 (03) : 949 - 983