Effect of stress testing on left ventricular mechanical synchrony by phase analysis of gated positron emission tomography in patients with normal myocardial perfusion

被引:25
|
作者
AlJaroudi, Wael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alraies, M. Chadi [2 ,3 ]
DiFilippo, Frank [2 ,3 ]
Brunken, Richard C. [2 ,3 ]
Cerqueira, Manuel D. [2 ,3 ]
Jaber, Wael A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Heart & Vasc, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Inst Heart, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Vasc Imaging Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
LV mechanical dyssynchrony; Stress testing; Phase analysis; PET; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DYSSYNCHRONY ASSESSMENT; PREDICT RESPONSE; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; SPECT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; REST; CRT;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-011-2025-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
There are limited data on whether differences exist in left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony indices derived from stress versus rest gated positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Stress/rest Rb-82 gated PET was performed in consecutive patients with normal MPI between 2006 and 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 [LV ejection fraction (EF) a parts per thousand yen 55% and QRS < 120 ms] and group 2 (LVEF a parts per thousand currency sign35%). Images were acquired on a dedicated PET scanner prior to and on a hybrid PET/CT system after November 2008. LV dyssynchrony indices [phase standard deviation (SD)A degrees and SD (ms)] were derived from stress and rest gated images. There were 91 patients in group 1 (age 61 +/- 13, LVEF 66 +/- 8%, normal QRS) and 126 in group 2 (age 66 +/- 12, LVEF 25 +/- 7%). The stress derived LVEF were significantly higher than rest for either group (p < 0.0001). Patients with cardiomyopathy had significantly higher dyssynchrony indices compared to those with normal LVEF (rest SDA degrees 49.2 A +/- 21.5A degrees vs 16.8 A +/- 7.8A degrees and stress SDA degrees 42.5 A +/- 19.4A degrees vs 12.4 A +/- 3.7A degrees, respectively, p < 0.0001 for both). The dyssynchrony indices derived from rest gated images were significantly higher than those derived from stress in both groups (p < 0.001 by unpaired and paired t test) and irrespective of the type of PET scanner utilized. Finally, 20/87 (23%) patients with normal LVEF and 27/66 (41%) of those with cardiomyopathy but without dyssynchrony based on stress indices were recategorized as having significant dyssynchrony given their resting indices. LV mechanical dyssynchrony indices by phase analysis are smaller when derived from peak stress versus rest gated PET imaging in patients with normal MPI, irrespective of the resting LVEF.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 672
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The prognostic value of mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony defined by phase analysis from gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging among patients with coronary heart disease
    Hess, Paul L.
    Shaw, Linda K.
    Fudim, Marat
    Iskandrian, Ami E.
    Borges-Neto, Salvador
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (02) : 482 - 490
  • [32] Characterization of left ventricular diastolic parameters of gated-single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with diabetes and normal myocardial perfusion and systolic function
    Ghaedian, Tahereh
    Abdinejad, Maryam
    Aieneh, Pegah
    Ebrahimi, Sadegh
    Rezaei, Mehdi
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 44 (09) : 788 - 794
  • [33] Evaluation of mechanical dyssynchrony and myocardial perfusion using phase analysis of gated SPECT imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
    Mark A. Trimble
    Salvador Borges-Neto
    Emily F. Honeycutt
    Linda K. Shaw
    Robert Pagnanelli
    Ji Chen
    Ami E. Iskandrian
    Ernest V. Garcia
    Eric J. Velazquez
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2008, 15 : 663 - 670
  • [34] Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony graduation of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT phase analysis: What next
    Zafrir, Nili
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) : 1009 - 1011
  • [35] Left ventricular segmentation in myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: tailor-made or pret-a-porter?
    Caobelli, Federico
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 20 (05) : 502 - 503
  • [36] Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony as Assessed by Phase Analysis of ECG-Gated SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
    Chen, Ji
    Garcia, Ernest V.
    Lerakis, Stamatios
    Henneman, Maureen M.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    Trimble, Mark A.
    Borges-Neto, Salvador
    Velazquez, Eric J.
    Iskandrian, Ami E.
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2008, 25 (10): : 1186 - 1194
  • [37] Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
    Ji Chen
    Maureen M. Henneman
    Mark A. Trimble
    Jeroen J. Bax
    Salvador Borges-Neto
    Ami E. Iskandrian
    Kenneth J. Nichols
    Ernest V. Garcia
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2008, 15 : 127 - 136
  • [38] Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
    Chen, Ji
    Henneman, Maureen M.
    Trimble, Mark A.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    Borges-Neto, Salvador
    Iskandrian, Ami E.
    Nichols, Kenneth J.
    Garcia, Ernest V.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (01) : 127 - 136
  • [39] The evaluation of left ventricular dyssynchronization in patients with hypertension by phase analysis of myocardial perfusion-gated SPECT
    Ozdemir, Semra
    Kirilmaz, Bahadir
    Barutcu, Ahmet
    Tan, Yusuf Ziya
    Celik, Fatmanur
    Akgoz, Semra
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (03) : 240 - 247
  • [40] Predictors and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony response during stress-gated positron emission tomography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy
    Wael AlJaroudi
    M. Chadi Alraies
    Venu Menon
    Richard C. Brunken
    Manuel D. Cerqueira
    Wael A. Jaber
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2012, 19 : 958 - 969