Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial

被引:25
作者
Young, David C. [1 ,2 ]
Delaney, Tina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Armson, B. Anthony [1 ,2 ]
Fanning, Cora [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] IWK Hlth Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, St John, NF, Canada
关键词
FOLEY CATHETER; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; INSERT; TERM; GEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0227245
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective To compare effectiveness and safety of oral misoprostol (50 mu g every four hours as needed), low dose vaginal misoprostol (25 to 50 mu g every six hours as needed), and our established dinoprostone vaginal gel (one to two mg every six hours as needed) induction. Materials and methods Consenting women with a live term single cephalic fetus for indicated labor induction were randomized (3N = 511). Prior uterine surgery or non-reassuring fetal surveillance were exclusions. Concealed computer generated randomization was stratified and blocked. Newborns were assessed by a team unaware of group assignment. The primary outcome was time from induction at randomization to vaginal birth for initial parametric analysis. Sample size was based on mean difference of 240 minutes with alpha(2) = 0.05 and power 95%. Nonparametric analysis was also pre-specified ranking cesareans as longest vaginal births. Results Enrollment was from April 1999 to December 2000. Demographics were similar across groups. Analysis was by intent to treat, with no loss to follow up. Mean time (+/- SD) to vaginal birth was 1356 (+/- 1033) minutes for oral misoprostol, 1530 (+/- 3249) minutes for vaginal misoprostol, and 1208 (+/- 613) minutes for vaginal dinoprostone (P = 0.46, ANOVA). Median times to vaginal birth were 1571, 1339, and 1451 minutes respectively (P = 0.46, KruskalWallis). Vaginal births occurred within 24 hours in 44.9, 53.5 and 47.7% respectively (P = 0.27, chi(2)). There were no significant differences in Kaplan Meier survival analyses, cesareans, adverse effects, or maternal satisfaction. The newborn who met birth asphyxia criteria received vaginal misoprostol, as did. all three other newborns with cord artery pH< 7.0 (P = 0.04, Fisher Exact). Conclusion There was no significant difference in effectiveness of the three groups. Profound newborn acidemia, though infrequent, occurred only with low dose vaginal misoprostol.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Methods to induce labour: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Alfirevic, Z. ;
Keeney, E. ;
Dowswell, T. ;
Welton, N. J. ;
Medley, N. ;
Dias, S. ;
Jones, L. V. ;
Caldwell, D. M. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (09) :1462-1470
[2]   Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Keeney, Edna ;
Dowswell, Therese ;
Welton, Nicky J. ;
Dias, Sofia ;
Jones, Leanne V. ;
Navaratnam, Kate ;
Caldwell, Deborah M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
[3]   Oral misoprostol for induction of labour [J].
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Aflaifel, Nasreen ;
Weeks, Andrew .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (06)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V114, P386, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[6]   A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction [J].
Bennett, KA ;
Butt, K ;
Crane, JMG ;
Hutchens, D ;
Young, DC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (04) :481-486
[7]   Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour [J].
Boulvain, M. ;
Kelly, A. ;
Irion, O. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (01)
[8]   Direct transport of progesterone from vagina to uterus [J].
Cicinelli, E ;
de Ziegler, D ;
Bulletti, C ;
Matteo, MG ;
Schonauer, LM ;
Galantino, P .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (03) :403-406
[9]  
CURTIS P, 1987, J REPROD MED, V32, P91
[10]   Comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol on uterine contractility [J].
Danielsson, KG ;
Marions, L ;
Rodriguez, A ;
Spur, BW ;
Wong, PYK ;
Bygdeman, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (02) :275-280