A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials

被引:44
作者
MacLennan, Steven [1 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [3 ]
Bekema, Hanneke [4 ]
Campbell, Marion [2 ]
Ramsay, Craig [2 ]
N'Dow, James [1 ,5 ]
MacLennan, Sara [1 ]
Vale, Luke [6 ]
Dahm, Philipp [7 ,8 ]
Mottet, Nicolas [9 ]
Lam, Thomas [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Acad Urol Unit, Hlth Sci Bldg,2nd Floor,Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Biostat, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Anesthesiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Dept Urol, Aberdeen, Scotland
[6] Univ Newcastle, Inst Hlth & Soc, Hlth Econ Grp, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[7] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Minneapolis VA Hlth Care Syst, Minneapolis, MN USA
[9] Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, St Etienne, France
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
core outcome set; localised prostate cancer; clinical trials; consensus process; Delphi survey; consensus group meeting; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MEN; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/bju.13854
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) applicable for effectiveness trials of all interventions for localised prostate cancer. Many treatments exist for localised prostate cancer, although it is unclear which offers the optimal therapeutic ratio; which is confounded by inconsistencies in the selection, definition, measurement and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. Patients, Subjects and Methods A list of 79 outcomes was derived from a systematic review of published localised prostate cancer effectiveness studies and semi-structured interviews with 15 patients with prostate cancer patients. A two-stage consensus process involving 118 patients and 56 international healthcare professionals (HCPs; cancer specialist nurses, urological surgeons and oncologists) was undertaken, consisting of a three-round Delphi survey followed by a face-to-face consensus panel meeting of 13 HCPs and eight patients. Results The final COS included 19 outcomes. In all, 12 apply to all interventions: death from prostate cancer, death from any cause, local disease recurrence, distant disease recurrence/metastases, disease progression, need for salvage therapy, overall quality of life, stress urinary incontinence, urinary function, bowel function, faecal incontinence, and sexual function. Seven were intervention-specific: perioperative deaths (surgery), positive surgical margin (surgery), thromboembolic disease (surgery), bothersome or symptomatic urethral or anastomotic stricture (surgery), need for curative treatment (active surveillance), treatment failure (ablative therapy), and side-effects of hormonal therapy (hormone therapy). The UK-centric participants may limit the generalisability to other countries, but trialists should reason why the COS would not be applicable. The default position should not be that a COS developed in one country will automatically not be applicable elsewhere. Conclusion We have established a COS for trials of effectiveness in localised prostate cancer, applicable across all interventions that should be measured in all localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.
引用
收藏
页码:E64 / E79
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Banxia Software, STUD RESP SYST
  • [2] Consistency in Design and Collaboration in Delivery: Key to Successful Randomised Controlled Trials in Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1084 - 1085
  • [3] Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0
    Boers, Maarten
    Kirwan, John R.
    Wells, George
    Beaton, Dorcas
    Gossec, Laure
    d'Agostino, Maria-Antonietta
    Conaghan, Philip G.
    Bingham, Clifton O., III
    Brooks, Peter
    Landewe, Robert
    March, Lyn
    Simon, Lee S.
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Strand, Vibeke
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (07) : 745 - 753
  • [4] The management of Otitis Media with Effusion in children with cleft palate (mOMEnt): a feasibility study and economic evaluation
    Bruce, Iain
    Harman, Nicola
    Williamson, Paula
    Tierney, Stephanie
    Callery, Peter
    Mohiuddin, Syed
    Payne, Katherine
    Fenwick, Elisabeth
    Kirkham, Jamie
    O'Brien, Kevin
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (68) : 1 - +
  • [5] Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Critical Analysis of the Literature
    Budaeus, Lars
    Bolla, Michel
    Bossi, Alberto
    Cozzarini, Cesare
    Crook, Juanita
    Widmark, Anders
    Wiegel, Thomas
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (01) : 112 - 127
  • [6] Variation in Treatment Associated With Life Expectancy in a Population-Based Cohort of Men With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer
    Daskivich, Timothy J.
    Lai, Julie
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Setodji, Claude M.
    Hanley, Janet M.
    Litwin, Mark S.
    Saigal, Christopher
    [J]. CANCER, 2014, 120 (23) : 3642 - 3650
  • [7] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Artibani, Walter
    Cestari, Andrea
    Galfano, Antonio
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Menon, Mani
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Patel, Vipul
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) : 1037 - 1063
  • [8] Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
    Gorst, Sarah L.
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Clarke, Mike
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (01):
  • [9] GRADE:: what is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Vist, Gunn E.
    Kunz, Regina
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Schunemann, Holger
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7651): : 995 - 999B
  • [10] Hegarty J, 2010, RADICAL PROSTATECTOM