A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials

被引:46
作者
MacLennan, Steven [1 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [3 ]
Bekema, Hanneke [4 ]
Campbell, Marion [2 ]
Ramsay, Craig [2 ]
N'Dow, James [1 ,5 ]
MacLennan, Sara [1 ]
Vale, Luke [6 ]
Dahm, Philipp [7 ,8 ]
Mottet, Nicolas [9 ]
Lam, Thomas [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Acad Urol Unit, Hlth Sci Bldg,2nd Floor,Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Biostat, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Anesthesiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Aberdeen Royal Infirm, Dept Urol, Aberdeen, Scotland
[6] Univ Newcastle, Inst Hlth & Soc, Hlth Econ Grp, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[7] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Minneapolis VA Hlth Care Syst, Minneapolis, MN USA
[9] Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, St Etienne, France
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
core outcome set; localised prostate cancer; clinical trials; consensus process; Delphi survey; consensus group meeting; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MEN; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/bju.13854
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) applicable for effectiveness trials of all interventions for localised prostate cancer. Many treatments exist for localised prostate cancer, although it is unclear which offers the optimal therapeutic ratio; which is confounded by inconsistencies in the selection, definition, measurement and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. Patients, Subjects and Methods A list of 79 outcomes was derived from a systematic review of published localised prostate cancer effectiveness studies and semi-structured interviews with 15 patients with prostate cancer patients. A two-stage consensus process involving 118 patients and 56 international healthcare professionals (HCPs; cancer specialist nurses, urological surgeons and oncologists) was undertaken, consisting of a three-round Delphi survey followed by a face-to-face consensus panel meeting of 13 HCPs and eight patients. Results The final COS included 19 outcomes. In all, 12 apply to all interventions: death from prostate cancer, death from any cause, local disease recurrence, distant disease recurrence/metastases, disease progression, need for salvage therapy, overall quality of life, stress urinary incontinence, urinary function, bowel function, faecal incontinence, and sexual function. Seven were intervention-specific: perioperative deaths (surgery), positive surgical margin (surgery), thromboembolic disease (surgery), bothersome or symptomatic urethral or anastomotic stricture (surgery), need for curative treatment (active surveillance), treatment failure (ablative therapy), and side-effects of hormonal therapy (hormone therapy). The UK-centric participants may limit the generalisability to other countries, but trialists should reason why the COS would not be applicable. The default position should not be that a COS developed in one country will automatically not be applicable elsewhere. Conclusion We have established a COS for trials of effectiveness in localised prostate cancer, applicable across all interventions that should be measured in all localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.
引用
收藏
页码:E64 / E79
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Banxia Software, STUD RESP SYST
[2]   Consistency in Design and Collaboration in Delivery: Key to Successful Randomised Controlled Trials in Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Blazeby, Jane M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) :1084-1085
[3]   Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 [J].
Boers, Maarten ;
Kirwan, John R. ;
Wells, George ;
Beaton, Dorcas ;
Gossec, Laure ;
d'Agostino, Maria-Antonietta ;
Conaghan, Philip G. ;
Bingham, Clifton O., III ;
Brooks, Peter ;
Landewe, Robert ;
March, Lyn ;
Simon, Lee S. ;
Singh, Jasvinder A. ;
Strand, Vibeke ;
Tugwell, Peter .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (07) :745-753
[4]   The management of Otitis Media with Effusion in children with cleft palate (mOMEnt): a feasibility study and economic evaluation [J].
Bruce, Iain ;
Harman, Nicola ;
Williamson, Paula ;
Tierney, Stephanie ;
Callery, Peter ;
Mohiuddin, Syed ;
Payne, Katherine ;
Fenwick, Elisabeth ;
Kirkham, Jamie ;
O'Brien, Kevin .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (68) :1-+
[5]   Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Critical Analysis of the Literature [J].
Budaeus, Lars ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Bossi, Alberto ;
Cozzarini, Cesare ;
Crook, Juanita ;
Widmark, Anders ;
Wiegel, Thomas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (01) :112-127
[6]   Variation in Treatment Associated With Life Expectancy in a Population-Based Cohort of Men With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer [J].
Daskivich, Timothy J. ;
Lai, Julie ;
Dick, Andrew W. ;
Setodji, Claude M. ;
Hanley, Janet M. ;
Litwin, Mark S. ;
Saigal, Christopher .
CANCER, 2014, 120 (23) :3642-3650
[7]   Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Menon, Mani ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Patel, Vipul ;
Rassweiler, Jens ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) :1037-1063
[8]   Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey [J].
Gorst, Sarah L. ;
Gargon, Elizabeth ;
Clarke, Mike ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Williamson, Paula R. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (01)
[9]   GRADE:: what is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? [J].
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Schunemann, Holger .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7651) :995-999B
[10]  
Hegarty J, 2010, RADICAL PROSTATECTOM