Timing and severity of inhibitor development in recombinant versus plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates: a SIPPET analysis

被引:33
|
作者
Peyvandi, F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cannavo, A. [1 ,2 ]
Garagiola, I. [1 ,2 ]
Palla, R. [1 ,2 ]
Mannucci, P. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rosendaal, F. R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Osped Maggiore Policlin, IRCCS Ca Granda, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, Milan, Italy
[2] Luigi Villa Fdn, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Pathophysiol & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
antibodies; factor VIII; hemophilia A; inhibitor; plasma;
D O I
10.1111/jth.13888
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII) is the most severe complication in the early phases of treatment of severe hemophilia A. Recently, a randomized trial, the Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers (SIPPET) demonstrated a 2-fold higher risk of inhibitor development in children treated with recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products than with plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) during the first 50 exposure days (EDs). Objective/Methods: In this post-hoc SIPPET analysis we evaluated the rate of inhibitor incidence over time by every 5 EDs (from 0 to 50 EDs) in patients treated with different classes of FVIII product, made possible by a frequent testing regime. Results: The highest rate of inhibitor development occurred in the first 10 EDs, with a large contrast between rFVIII and pdFVIII during the first 5 EDs: hazard ratio 3.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-9.74) for all inhibitors and 4.19 (95% CI, 1.18-14.8) for high-titer inhibitors. For patients treated with pdFVIII, the peak of inhibitor development occurred later (6-10 EDs) and lasted for a shorter time. Conclusion: These results emphasize the high immunologic vulnerability of patients during the earliest exposure to FVIII concentrates, with the strongest response to recombinant FVIII products.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 43
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lower inhibitor risk of plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates versus recombinant factor VIII concentrates in patients with severe haemophilia A : result from SIPPET study and comments
    Biron-Andreani, Christine
    Diaz, Isabelle
    Navarro, Robert
    Schved, Jean-Francois
    HEMATOLOGIE, 2019, 25 (02): : 93 - 99
  • [2] Plasma-derived versus recombinant factor VIII concentrates for the treatment of haemophilia A: plasma-derived is better
    Mannucci, Pier Mannuccio
    BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2010, 8 (04) : 288 - 291
  • [3] Plasma-derived versus recombinant Factor VIII concentrates for the treatment of haemophilia A: recombinant is better
    Franchini, Massimo
    BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2010, 8 (04) : 292 - 296
  • [4] Inhibitor development and efficacy of recombinant vs. plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates in haemophilia A patients
    Siegmund, B.
    Richter, H.
    Pollmann, H.
    Orlovic, M.
    Gottstein, S. .
    Klamroth, R.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2008, 14 : 51 - 51
  • [5] Relationships between factor VIII:Ag and factor VIII in recombinant and plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates
    Lin, Y
    Yang, X
    Chevrier, MC
    Craven, S
    Barrowcliffe, TW
    Lemieux, R
    Ofosu, FA
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2004, 10 (05) : 459 - 469
  • [6] Effect of plasma-derived or recombinant factor VIII on inhibitor development: a systematic review
    Iorio, A.
    Halimeh, S.
    Goldenberg, N.
    Kenet, G.
    Young, G.
    Brandao, L.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2010, 16 : 74 - 74
  • [7] Italian consumption of plasma-derived factor VIII after the SIPPET study
    Traversa, Giuseppe
    Trotta, Francesco
    BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2017, 15 (03) : 283 - 284
  • [8] Factor VIII safety: plasma-derived versus recombinant products
    Gringeri, Alessandro
    BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2011, 9 (04) : 366 - 370
  • [9] Plasma-derived versus recombinant factor VIII for the treatment of hemophilia A
    Kasper, CK
    VOX SANGUINIS, 1996, 70 : 17 - 20
  • [10] INHIBITOR QUESTIONS - PLASMA-DERIVED FACTOR-VIII AND RECOMBINANT FACTOR-VIII
    BRAY, G
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 1994, 68 : S29 - S34