HAS SNELLEN CHART LOST THE BATTLE TO ETDRS IN CATARACT SURGERY VISUAL ACUITY EVALUATION

被引:1
|
作者
Pajic, Sanja Petrovic [1 ]
Petrovic, Tiana [2 ]
Stojkovic, Milenko [1 ,2 ]
Andelic, Sladana [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Eye Hosp, Clin Ctr Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Med, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Emergency Med Care, Frank dEperea 5, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[4] Singidunum Univ, Fac Hlth & Business, Valjevo, Serbia
关键词
Visual acuity; ETDRS chart; Snellen chart; LOCS III; Age-related cataract; REPEATABILITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.20471/acc.2021.60.03.15
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study was designed to explore practical differences between visual acuity (VA) scores measured on Snellen chart versus ETDRS chart, to grade cataracts using LOCS III system, and to compare VA on both charts depending on cataract grade and type. Prospective evaluation of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity was carried out on the eye scheduled for cataract surgery preoperatively and postoperatively on the Snellen and ETDRS charts. The study was carried out at Department of Eye Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, during a two-year period. Inclusion criteria were met by 540 patients who underwent testing, surgery, data collection and analysis. The mean VA score was better on ETDRS than on Snellen chart. The mean difference was 6.05 letters or 1.21 lines. VA results correlated with all types of cataract regardless of the chart used, with the highest statistical significance (p<0.0001) for subcapsular cataract. The ETDRS chart was found to be more discriminative and precise than Snellen chart, especially for poor VA.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 449
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Snellen visual acuity evaluation
    Zapparoli, Marcio
    Klein, Fernando
    Moreira, Hamilton
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2009, 72 (06) : 783 - 788
  • [2] Estimating visual acuity by character counting using the Snellen visual acuity chart
    Levy, AH
    McCulley, TJ
    Lam, BL
    Feuer, WJ
    EYE, 2005, 19 (06) : 622 - 624
  • [3] Estimating visual acuity by character counting using the Snellen visual acuity chart
    A H Levy
    T J McCulley
    B L Lam
    W J Feuer
    Eye, 2005, 19 : 622 - 624
  • [4] A comparison of visual acuity measured by ETDRS chart and Standard Logarithmic Visual Acuity chart among outpatients
    Wang, Tao
    Huang, Pei-Jie
    Chen, Chen
    Liu, Ding-Wei
    Yi, Jing-Lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 14 (04) : 536 - 540
  • [5] Comparison of Snellen Visual Acuity Measurements in Retinal Clinical Practice to Electronic ETDRS Protocol Visual Acuity Assessment
    Baker, Carl W.
    Josic, Kristin
    Maguire, Maureen G.
    Jampol, Lee M.
    Martin, Daniel F.
    Rofagha, Soraya
    Sun, Jennifer K.
    DRCR Retina Network
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 130 (05) : 533 - 541
  • [6] Accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS visual acuity chart: methodological issues
    Siamak Sabour
    Fariba Ghassemi
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2016, 254 : 2073 - 2074
  • [7] Snellen iPad app versus traditional light-box snellen chart in distance visual acuity
    Al-Essa, Aiad
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : 1745 - 1747
  • [8] Reproducibility of visual acuity measurement using the ETDRS chart in daily clinical practice
    Nicolas, C.
    Debellemaniere, G.
    Boissier, F.
    Girard, C.
    Schwartz, C.
    Delbosc, B.
    Saleh, M.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2016, 39 (08): : 700 - 705
  • [9] Visual acuity as measured with Landolt C chart and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart
    Kuo, Hsi-Kung
    Kuo, Ming-Tse
    Tiong, Ing-Soo
    Wu, Pei-Chang
    Chen, Yung-Jen
    Chen, Chih-Hsin
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 249 (04) : 601 - 605
  • [10] Reply to: Accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS visual acuity chart: methodological issues
    Shamir, Reuben R.
    Friedman, Yael G.
    Joskowicz, Leo
    Mimouni, Michael
    Blumenthal, Eytan Z.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 254 (10) : 2075 - 2075