Sinus augmentation using a mini-pig model: Effect of ceramic and allogeneic bone biomaterials

被引:5
|
作者
Susin, Cristiano [1 ]
Fiorini, Tiago [1 ]
Lee, Jaebum [1 ]
de Freitas, Rubens Moreno [1 ]
Chiu, Hsien-Chung [1 ]
Prasad, Hari S. [1 ]
Buxton, Amanda N. [1 ]
Wikesjo, Ulf M. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Augusta Univ, Dent Coll Georgia, LAPCR, Augusta, GA 30904 USA
关键词
bone biomaterials; bone morphogenetic protein-2; mini-pig model; osseointegration; sinus augmentation; FLOOR ELEVATION PROCEDURES; MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN-2; MAXILLARY SINUS; AUTOGENOUS BONE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; RIDGE AUGMENTATION; GRINDING TECHNIQUE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; DEFECT MODEL; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1111/jcpe.12766
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Present clinical practice broadly relies on off-the-shelf allogeneic, xenogeneic or synthetic bone biomaterials in support of sinus augmentation. Also, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier (rhBMP-2/ACS) has been shown to support clinically relevant bone formation when used to augment the maxillary sinus. Objectives: To evaluate local bone formation/dental implant osseointegration following implantation of two particulate bone biomaterials using the mini-pig sinus augmentation model. Methods: Nine adult Gottingen mini-pigs were used for evaluation of a biphasic ceramic (15%/85% HA/beta-TCP) and an allogeneic mineralized bone biomaterial. Treatments randomized to contralateral sinus sites included sham-surgery (control) and biomaterials. Two threaded dental implants (empty set4.0 x 11.5 mm) were placed at each sinus site. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks for histologic analysis. Results: Execution of the surgical protocol and healing was unremarkable. Limited infraorbital swelling was observed until suture removal. The biphasic ceramic and allogeneic bone biomaterials produced significantly increased bone formation (5.2 +/- 1.9 mm and 4.9 +/- 1.6 mm vs. 2.6 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.05) and osseointegration (18.0 +/- 6.0% and 25.1 +/- 18.2% vs. 10.1 +/- 8.0%, p < 0.05) over the sham-surgery control. No significant differences were observed between biomaterials. Conclusions: Implantation of biphasic ceramic or allogeneic bone biomaterials enhances bone formation in the mini-pig maxillary sinus, however, dental implant bone support is incomplete resulting in overall limited osseointegration.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1066
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sinus augmentation using rhBMP-2/ACS in a mini-pig model: Influence of an adjunctive ceramic bone biomaterial
    Susin, Cristiano
    Lee, Jaebum
    Fiorini, Tiago
    de Freitas, Rubens Moreno
    Chiu, Hsien-Chung
    Prasad, Hari S.
    Buxton, Amanda N.
    Wikesjo, Ulf M. E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 45 (08) : 1005 - 1013
  • [2] Sinus augmentation using rhBMP-2/ACS in a mini-pig model: relative efficacy of autogenous fresh particulate iliac bone grafts
    Lee, Jaebum
    Susin, Cristiano
    Rodriguez, Nancy A.
    de Stefano, Jamie
    Prasad, Hari S.
    Buxton, Amanda N.
    Wikesjoe, Ulf M. E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (05) : 497 - 504
  • [3] A Mini-Pig Mandibular Defect Model for Evaluation of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration
    Van Oirschot, Bart A. J. A.
    Geven, Edwin J. W.
    Mikos, Antonios G.
    Van den Beucken, Jeroen J. J. P.
    Jansen, John A.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART C-METHODS, 2022, 28 (05) : 193 - 201
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF SURFACE TREATMENT OF THE CERVICAL AREA OF IMPLANT ON BONE REGENERATION IN MINI-PIG
    Cho, Jin-Yong
    Kim, Young-Jun
    Yu, Min-Gi
    Kook, Min-Suk
    Oh, Hee-Kyun
    Park, Hong-Ju
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2008, 34 (03) : 285 - 292
  • [5] Evaluation of a Polyethylene Glycol-Osteogenic Protein-1 System on Alveolar Bone Regeneration in the Mini-Pig
    Catros, Sylvain
    Molenberg, Aart
    Freilich, Martin
    Dard, Michel
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2015, 41 (04) : E96 - E101
  • [6] Experimental maxillary sinus augmentation using a highly bioactive glass ceramic
    Vivan, Rodrigo Ricci
    Mecca, Carlos Eduardo
    Biguetti, Claudia Cristina
    Muniz Renno, Ana Claudia
    Okamoto, Roberta
    Cavenago, Bruno Cavalini
    Duarte, Marco Hungaro
    Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 27 (02) : 1 - 10
  • [7] The optimization of biomaterials in maxillary sinus augmentation associated with bone marrow aspirate concentrate
    Balderrama, Isis de Fatima
    Stuani, Vitor de Toledo
    Cardoso, Matheus Volz
    Cunha, Gabriela Viana
    do Prado Manfredi, Gustavo Goncalves
    Ferreira, Rafael
    MATERIA-RIO DE JANEIRO, 2022, 27 (01):
  • [8] Guided bone regeneration using collagen membranes for sinus augmentation
    Li, Xiang
    Chen, Song-ling
    Zhu, Shuang-xi
    Zha, Guo-qing
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 50 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [9] Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs
    Jensen, Thomas
    Schou, Soren
    Gundersen, Hans Jorgen G.
    Forman, Julie Lyng
    Terheyden, Hendrik
    Holmstrup, Palle
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (06) : 635 - 644
  • [10] Influence of residual bone height and sinus width on the outcome of maxillary sinus bone augmentation using anorganic bovine bone
    Pignaton, Tulio Bonna
    Wenzel, Ann
    de Almeida Ferreira, Carlos Eduardo
    Martinelli, Carolina Borges
    Oliveira, Guilherme J. P. L.
    Marcantonio, Elcio, Jr.
    Spin-Neto, Rubens
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (04) : 315 - 323