The Consequences of Reading Inaccurate Information

被引:62
|
作者
Rapp, David N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Psychol, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Sch Educ & Social Policy, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
memory; reading comprehension; learning; misinformation; text processing; INCORRECT INFORMATION; CONTINUED INFLUENCE; MEMORY; MISINFORMATION; COMPREHENSION; KNOWLEDGE; FICTION; CREDIBILITY; VALIDATION; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1177/0963721416649347
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We are regularly confronted with statements that are inaccurate, sometimes obviously so. Unfortunately, people can be influenced by and rely upon inaccurate information, engaging in less critical evaluation than might be hoped. Empirical studies have consistently demonstrated that even when people should know better, reading inaccurate information can affect their performance on subsequent tasks. What encourages people's encoding and use of false statements? The current article outlines how reliance on inaccurate information is a predictable consequence of the routine cognitive processes associated with memory, problem solving, and comprehension. This view helps identify conditions under which inaccurate information is more or less likely to influence subsequent decisions. These conditions are informative in the consideration of information-design approaches and instructional methods intended to support critical thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 285
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fool Me Twice: The Consequences of Reading (and Rereading) Inaccurate Information
    Jacovina, Matthew E.
    Hinze, Scott R.
    Rapp, David N.
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) : 558 - 568
  • [2] Reducing reliance on inaccurate information
    Rapp, David N.
    Hinze, Scott R.
    Kohlhepp, Kristine
    Ryskin, Rachel A.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2014, 42 (01) : 11 - 26
  • [3] Reader, interrupted: Do disruptions during encoding influence the use of inaccurate information?
    Donovan, Amalia M.
    Theodosis, Elias
    Rapp, David N.
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 32 (06) : 775 - 786
  • [4] Can confidence help account for and redress the effects of reading inaccurate information?
    Salovich, Nikita A.
    Donovan, Amalia M.
    Hinze, Scott R.
    Rapp, David N.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2021, 49 (02) : 293 - 310
  • [5] Reducing reliance on inaccurate information
    David N. Rapp
    Scott R. Hinze
    Kristine Kohlhepp
    Rachel A. Ryskin
    Memory & Cognition, 2014, 42 : 11 - 26
  • [6] How Nonexperts Understand Conflicting Information on Social Science Issues The Role of Perceived Plausibility and Reading Goals
    Maier, Johanna
    Richter, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY-THEORIES METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 25 (01) : 14 - 26
  • [7] Does the Certainty of Information Influence the Updating Process? Evidence From the Reading of News Articles
    Blanc, Nathalie
    Stiegler-Balfour, Jennifer J.
    O'Brien, Edward J.
    DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2011, 48 (06) : 387 - 403
  • [8] The Role of Familiarity in Correcting Inaccurate Information
    Swire, Briony
    Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
    Lewandowsky, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (12) : 1948 - 1961
  • [9] From Conversations to Digital Communication: The Mnemonic Consequences of Consuming and Producing Information via Social Media
    Stone, Charles B.
    Wang, Qi
    TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (04) : 774 - 793
  • [10] Can confidence help account for and redress the effects of reading inaccurate information?
    Nikita A. Salovich
    Amalia M. Donovan
    Scott R. Hinze
    David N. Rapp
    Memory & Cognition, 2021, 49 : 293 - 310