Sequestration of dissolved CO2 in the Oriskany formation

被引:25
|
作者
Dilmore, Robert M. [1 ]
Allen, Douglas E. [2 ]
Jones, J. Richard Mccarthy [1 ]
Hedges, Sheila W. [1 ]
Soong, Yee [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Energy Technol Lab, US Dept Energy, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
[2] Salem State Coll, Dept Geol Sci, Salem, MA 01970 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es702229f
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Experiments were conducted to determine the solubility of CO2 in a natural brine solution of the Oriskany formation under elevated temperature and pressure conditions. These data were collected at temperatures of 22 and 75 degrees C and pressures between 100 and 450 bar. Experimentally determined data were compared with CO2 solubility predictions using a model developed by Duan and Sun (Chem. GeoL 2003, 193,257-271). Model results compare well with Oriskany brine CO2 solubility data collected experimentally, suggesting that the Duan and Sun model is a reliable tool for estimating solution CO2 capacity in high salinity aquifers in the temperature and pressure range evaluated. The capacity for the Oriskany formation to sequester dissolved CO2 was calculated using results of the solubility models, estimation of the density of CO2 saturated brine, and available geographic information system (GIS) information on the formation depth and thickness. Results indicate that the Oriskany formation can hold approximately 0.36 gigatonnes of dissolved CO2 if the full basin is considered. When only the region where supercritical CO2 can exist (temperatures greater than 31 degrees C and pressures greater than 74 bar) is considered the capacity of the Oriskany formation to sequester dissolved CO2 is 0.31 gigatonnes. The capacity estimate considering the potential to sequester free-phase supercritical CO2 if brine were displaced from formation pore space is 8.8 gigatonnes in the Oriskany formation.
引用
收藏
页码:2760 / 2766
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Previews of CO2 injection system for CO2 ocean sequestration
    Nakajima, Y
    Kawagoe, Y
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 517 - 522
  • [32] Logistics of CO2 sequestration -: Options for CO2 transport.
    Mayer-Spohn, O
    Blesl, M
    Fahl, U
    Voss, A
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2006, 78 (04) : 435 - 444
  • [33] Regulating the geological sequestration of CO2
    Wilson, Elizabeth J.
    Morgan, M. Granger
    Apt, Jay
    Bonner, Mark
    Bunting, Christopher
    Gode, Jenny
    Haszeldine, R. Stuart
    Jaeger, Carlo C.
    Keith, David W.
    McCoy, Sean T.
    Pollak, Melisa F.
    Reiner, David M.
    Rubin, Edward S.
    Torvanger, Asbjorn
    Ulardic, Christina
    Vajjhala, Shalini P.
    Victor, David G.
    Wright, Iain W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (08) : 2718 - 2722
  • [34] CO2 sequestration examined by DOE
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1999, 77 (16) : 38 - 38
  • [35] Options for CO2 sequestration in Kuwait
    Neele, Filip
    Vandeweijer, Vincent
    Mayyan, Haya
    Sharma, Shashank Rakeshkumar
    Kamal, Dawood
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 2827 - 2835
  • [36] Sequestration of CO2 by Concrete Carbonation
    Galan, Isabel
    Andrade, Carmen
    Mora, Pedro
    Sanjuan, Miguel A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (08) : 3181 - 3186
  • [37] Geochemical aspects of CO2 sequestration
    Oelkers, EH
    Schott, J
    CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2005, 217 (3-4) : 183 - 186
  • [38] CO2 SEQUESTRATION AND EARTH PROCESSES
    Goel, Malti
    EVERYMANS SCIENCE, 2012, 47 (05): : 289 - 295
  • [39] Public outreach on CO2 sequestration
    Freund, P
    Hawkins, D
    Akai, M
    Herzog, H
    Fase, S
    Fuse, T
    Reilly, N
    Keith, D
    Herzog, H
    Larsen, E
    Hovorka, E
    Walker, S
    Lindeberg, E
    Haugen, P
    Czernichowski-Lauriol, I
    Anderson, J
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1511 - 1524
  • [40] CO2 - Going beyond sequestration
    Wray, Peter
    AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2010, 89 (06): : 21 - 21