Development and initial validation of the Cat HEalth and Wellbeing (CHEW) Questionnaire: a generic health-related quality of life instrument for cats

被引:26
作者
Freeman, Lisa M. [1 ]
Rodenberg, Cindy [2 ]
Narayanan, A. [2 ]
Olding, Jane [3 ,4 ]
Gooding, Margaret A. [3 ,5 ]
Koochaki, Patricia E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Cummings Sch Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, North Grafton, MA 01536 USA
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Global Stat & Data Management, Mason, OH 45040 USA
[3] Iams Co, Lewisburg, OH 45338 USA
[4] Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Mars Petcare, Franklin, TN USA
关键词
NONPHYSICAL ASPECTS; ANIMAL-WELFARE; SURVEY SF-36; CHRONIC PAIN; DOGS; TOOL; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; OUTCOMES; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1177/1098612X16657386
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aims of the study were to define factors that owners consider relevant to the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cats, to develop an instrument based on this information, and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the final instrument (the Cat HEalth and Wellbeing [CHEW] Questionnaire). Methods: Psychometric research techniques and guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration on outcome measures were used to develop a valid and reliable instrument. Fifty-four cat owners and caregivers participated in the qualitative research, while 1303 cat owners were included in the quantitative validation phase (development dataset, n = 648; validation dataset, n = 655). A random subset of cat owners (n = 391) also participated in test-retest evaluation. Qualitative research was used to generate a draft instrument, which was then subjected to quantitative validation techniques. These included item reduction, domain identification, data quality assessment, and exploratory and confirmatory analysis to develop a final instrument, which underwent confirmatory reliability and validity assessment. Results: A draft instrument with 11 domains and 100 items based on qualitative research underwent online quantitative validation testing which refined the instrument to eight domains and 33 items. Confirmatory reliability and validity assessment showed that the final instrument had good validity, was able to discriminate between cats by age and overall health status, and demonstrated good internal and test-retest reliability. Conclusions and relevance: The CHEW Questionnaire was developed and validated. Additional research is needed to verify its ability to differentiate cats with and without disease, and to assess its potential as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 701
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [21] Development and validation of a quality of life assessment tool for use in kennelled dogs (Canis familiaris)
    Kiddie, Jenna L.
    Collins, Lisa M.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2014, 158 : 57 - 68
  • [22] Lascelles BDX, 2007, J VET INTERN MED, V21, P410, DOI 10.1892/0891-6640(2007)21[410:EOCOMA]2.0.CO
  • [23] 2
  • [24] Development and validation of a survey for quality of life assessment by owners of healthy dogs
    Lavan, R. P.
    [J]. VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 197 (03) : 578 - 582
  • [25] Development of a questionnaire assessing health-related quality-of-life in dogs and cats with cancer
    Lynch, S.
    Savary-Bataille, K.
    Leeuw, B.
    Argyle, D. J.
    [J]. VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ONCOLOGY, 2011, 9 (03) : 172 - 182
  • [26] Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Research to Support Medical Product Labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices for the Assessment of Children and Adolescents Task Force
    Matza, Louis S.
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Riley, Anne W.
    Alexander, John J.
    Rajmil, Luis
    Pleil, Andreas M.
    Bullinger, Monika
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (04) : 461 - 479
  • [27] THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .2. PSYCHOMETRIC AND CLINICAL-TESTS OF VALIDITY IN MEASURING PHYSICAL AND MENTAL-HEALTH CONSTRUCTS
    MCHORNEY, CA
    WARE, JE
    RACZEK, AE
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (03) : 247 - 263
  • [28] THE VALIDITY AND RELATIVE PRECISION OF MOS SHORT-FORM AND LONG-FORM HEALTH-STATUS SCALES AND DARTMOUTH COOP CHARTS - RESULTS FROM THE MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY
    MCHORNEY, CA
    WARE, JE
    ROGERS, W
    RACZEK, AE
    LU, JFR
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (05) : MS253 - MS265
  • [29] THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .3. TESTS OF DATA QUALITY, SCALING ASSUMPTIONS, AND RELIABILITY ACROSS DIVERSE PATIENT GROUPS
    MCHORNEY, CA
    WARE, JE
    LU, JFR
    SHERBOURNE, CD
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (01) : 40 - 66
  • [30] Evaluation of a Quality-of-Life Tool for Dogs with Diabetes Mellitus
    Niessen, S. J. M.
    Powney, S.
    Guitian, J.
    Niessen, A. P. M.
    Pion, P. D.
    Shaw, J. A. M.
    Church, D. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 26 (04): : 953 - 961