Development and initial validation of the Cat HEalth and Wellbeing (CHEW) Questionnaire: a generic health-related quality of life instrument for cats

被引:26
作者
Freeman, Lisa M. [1 ]
Rodenberg, Cindy [2 ]
Narayanan, A. [2 ]
Olding, Jane [3 ,4 ]
Gooding, Margaret A. [3 ,5 ]
Koochaki, Patricia E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Cummings Sch Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, North Grafton, MA 01536 USA
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Global Stat & Data Management, Mason, OH 45040 USA
[3] Iams Co, Lewisburg, OH 45338 USA
[4] Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Mars Petcare, Franklin, TN USA
关键词
NONPHYSICAL ASPECTS; ANIMAL-WELFARE; SURVEY SF-36; CHRONIC PAIN; DOGS; TOOL; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; OUTCOMES; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1177/1098612X16657386
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aims of the study were to define factors that owners consider relevant to the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cats, to develop an instrument based on this information, and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the final instrument (the Cat HEalth and Wellbeing [CHEW] Questionnaire). Methods: Psychometric research techniques and guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration on outcome measures were used to develop a valid and reliable instrument. Fifty-four cat owners and caregivers participated in the qualitative research, while 1303 cat owners were included in the quantitative validation phase (development dataset, n = 648; validation dataset, n = 655). A random subset of cat owners (n = 391) also participated in test-retest evaluation. Qualitative research was used to generate a draft instrument, which was then subjected to quantitative validation techniques. These included item reduction, domain identification, data quality assessment, and exploratory and confirmatory analysis to develop a final instrument, which underwent confirmatory reliability and validity assessment. Results: A draft instrument with 11 domains and 100 items based on qualitative research underwent online quantitative validation testing which refined the instrument to eight domains and 33 items. Confirmatory reliability and validity assessment showed that the final instrument had good validity, was able to discriminate between cats by age and overall health status, and demonstrated good internal and test-retest reliability. Conclusions and relevance: The CHEW Questionnaire was developed and validated. Additional research is needed to verify its ability to differentiate cats with and without disease, and to assess its potential as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 701
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Mplus user's guide
  • [2] BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
  • [3] Owner-assessed indices of quality of life in cats and the relationship to the presence of degenerative joint disease
    Benito, Javier
    Gruen, Margaret E.
    Thomson, Andrea
    Simpson, Wendy
    Lascelles, B. Duncan X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2012, 14 (12) : 863 - 870
  • [4] Psychometric Validation of a General Health Quality of Life Tool for Cats Used to Compare Healthy Cats and Cats with Chronic Kidney Disease
    Bijsmans, E. S.
    Jepson, R. E.
    Syme, H. M.
    Elliott, J.
    Niessen, S. J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 30 (01) : 183 - 191
  • [5] Brakke Consulting Bayer Healthcare Animal Health division, 2013, BAYER VET CAR US STU
  • [6] Evaluation of a questionnaire for obtaining owner-perceived, weighted quality-of-life assessments for dogs with spinal cord injuries
    Budke, Christine M.
    Levine, Jonathan M.
    Kerwin, Sharon C.
    Levine, Gwendolyn J.
    Hettlich, Bianca F.
    Slater, Margaret R.
    [J]. JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 233 (06): : 925 - 930
  • [7] Feline osteoarthritis: a prospective study of 28 cases
    Clarke, S. P.
    Bennett, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2006, 47 (08) : 439 - 445
  • [8] Science-based assessment of animal welfare: farm animals
    Duncan, IJH
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (02): : 483 - 492
  • [9] Ferrans CE, 2004, Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods and Applications, P14
  • [10] Fonteyn ME, 1993, Qual. Health Res, V3, P430, DOI DOI 10.1177/104973239300300403