COVID-19 related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with defense strategies, emotions, powerlessness, attitudes, and time perspective

被引:2
|
作者
Celia, Giovanna [1 ]
Lausi, Giulia [2 ]
Girelli, Laura [3 ]
Cavicchiolo, Elisa [3 ]
Limone, Pierpaolo [1 ]
Giannini, Anna Maria [2 ]
Cozzolino, Mauro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Humanities Literature Cultural Heritage Educ, Foggia, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Psychol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Salerno, Dept Human Philosoph & Educ Sci, Fisciano, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
COVID-19 conspiratorial thinking; cluster analysis; defense mechanisms; coping strategies; time perspective; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; ANXIETY; MECHANISMS; HIV/AIDS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939615
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted individual's life and society, and such an emergency has increased the likelihood of recurring conspiratorial thinking. There is much research on broader conspiratorial thinking and studies on COVID-19-related conspiratorial thinking has been growing worldwide, moreover, the negative consequences of COVID-19 specific conspiratorial beliefs for people's health are clear. However, person-centered research aiming at identify groups of individuals who share patterns of relations between COVID-19 specific conspiratorial beliefs and other psychological features is still scarce. A sample of 1.002 people (18-40 years old, M = 23; SD = 5.19) responded to a questionnaire administered online. The aim was to identify groups of individuals based on their beliefs about COVID-19 conspiracy theories and to compare the groups identified in terms of psychological characteristics associated such as automatic defense mechanisms, coping strategies, powerlessness, emotions, emotional regulation, attitudes toward the COVID-19, social distancing discontent, perceptions of COVID-19 severity and temporal perspective. A k-mean cluster analysis identified the groups of Believers (22.26%), Ambivalent believers (34.3%), and Non-believers (43.21%). The three groups differ particularly in terms of defense mechanisms, and time perspective. Results suggested the need to tailor interventions for individuals believing in COVID-19 conspiratorial theories based on differences in the psychological characteristics among the three groups.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relationship Between COVID-19 Related Knowledge and Anxiety Among University Students: Exploring the Moderating Roles of School Climate and Coping Strategies
    Quansah, Frank
    Hagan, John E.
    Ankomah, Francis
    Srem-Sai, Medina
    Frimpong, James B.
    Sambah, Francis
    Schack, Thomas
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [32] Knowledge, Attitudes, Anxiety, and Preventive Behaviors Related to COVID-19 Among Healthcare Providers: A Developing Country's Perspective
    Hammad, Muhammad
    Fardoos, Sadaf
    Arif, Rasikh
    Ghani, Usman
    Paudel, Shailes
    Vardhan, Krishna
    Basani, Hima Bindu Reddy
    Challa, Sreehitha
    Khan, Ali Zeb
    Khan, Altamash Dad
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [33] Personality, Defenses, Mentalization, and Epistemic Trust Related to Pandemic Containment Strategies and the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Sequential Mediation Model
    Tanzilli, Annalisa
    Cibelli, Alice
    Liotti, Marianna
    Fiorentino, Flavia
    Williams, Riccardo
    Lingiardi, Vittorio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [34] When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID-19 pandemic
    Srol, Jakub
    Ballova Mikuskova, Eva
    Cavojova, Vladimira
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 720 - 729
  • [35] Coping strategies for COVID-19 pandemic-related stress and mental health during pregnancy
    Badon, Sylvia E.
    Croen, Lisa A.
    Ferrara, Assiamira
    Ames, Jennifer L.
    Hedderson, Monique M.
    Young-Wolff, Kelly C.
    Zhu, Yeyi
    Avalos, Lyndsay A.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2022, 309 : 309 - 313
  • [36] Are Attitudes towards COVID-19 Pandemic Related to Subjective Physical and Mental Health?
    Khachatryan, Kristine
    Beutel, Manfred E.
    Stoebel-Richter, Yve
    Zenger, Markus
    Berth, Hendrik
    Braehler, Elmar
    Schmidt, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [37] Design and Cross-Cultural Invariance of the COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (COVID-VCBS) in 13 Latin American Countries
    Caycho-Rodriguez, Tomas
    Valencia, Pablo D.
    Ventura-Leon, Jose
    Vilca, Lindsey W.
    Carbajal-Leon, Carlos
    Reyes-Bossio, Mario
    White, Michael
    Rojas-Jara, Claudio
    Polanco-Carrasco, Roberto
    Gallegos, Miguel
    Cervigni, Mauricio
    Martino, Pablo
    Palacios, Diego Alejandro
    Moreta-Herrera, Rodrigo
    Samaniego-Pinho, Antonio
    Lobos-Rivera, Marlon Elias
    Figares, Andres Buschiazzo
    Puerta-Cortes, Diana Ximena
    Corrales-Reyes, Ibrain Enrique
    Calderon, Raymundo
    Tapia, Bismarck Pinto
    Gallegos, Walter Arias L.
    Petzold, Olimpia
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [38] The impacts of information factors and health beliefs on attitudes towards social distancing behaviour during COVID-19
    Mai, Enping
    Taillon, Brian J.
    Haytko, Diana L.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 37 (17-18) : 1933 - 1953
  • [39] Coping Strategies and Their Relationship With Subjective Distress due to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil
    Campos, Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini
    Campos, Lucas Arrais
    Martins, Bianca Gonzalez
    Maroco, Joao
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2024, 127 (01) : 40 - 63
  • [40] The Relationship between Exercise and Mental Health Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: From the Perspective of Hope
    Yao, Yingying
    Chen, Jianqiao
    Dong, Dan
    Feng, Yi
    Qiao, Zhihong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)