共 50 条
COVID-19 related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with defense strategies, emotions, powerlessness, attitudes, and time perspective
被引:2
|作者:
Celia, Giovanna
[1
]
Lausi, Giulia
[2
]
Girelli, Laura
[3
]
Cavicchiolo, Elisa
[3
]
Limone, Pierpaolo
[1
]
Giannini, Anna Maria
[2
]
Cozzolino, Mauro
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Humanities Literature Cultural Heritage Educ, Foggia, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Psychol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Salerno, Dept Human Philosoph & Educ Sci, Fisciano, Italy
来源:
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
|
2022年
/
13卷
关键词:
COVID-19 conspiratorial thinking;
cluster analysis;
defense mechanisms;
coping strategies;
time perspective;
AFRICAN-AMERICANS;
ANXIETY;
MECHANISMS;
HIV/AIDS;
D O I:
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939615
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted individual's life and society, and such an emergency has increased the likelihood of recurring conspiratorial thinking. There is much research on broader conspiratorial thinking and studies on COVID-19-related conspiratorial thinking has been growing worldwide, moreover, the negative consequences of COVID-19 specific conspiratorial beliefs for people's health are clear. However, person-centered research aiming at identify groups of individuals who share patterns of relations between COVID-19 specific conspiratorial beliefs and other psychological features is still scarce. A sample of 1.002 people (18-40 years old, M = 23; SD = 5.19) responded to a questionnaire administered online. The aim was to identify groups of individuals based on their beliefs about COVID-19 conspiracy theories and to compare the groups identified in terms of psychological characteristics associated such as automatic defense mechanisms, coping strategies, powerlessness, emotions, emotional regulation, attitudes toward the COVID-19, social distancing discontent, perceptions of COVID-19 severity and temporal perspective. A k-mean cluster analysis identified the groups of Believers (22.26%), Ambivalent believers (34.3%), and Non-believers (43.21%). The three groups differ particularly in terms of defense mechanisms, and time perspective. Results suggested the need to tailor interventions for individuals believing in COVID-19 conspiratorial theories based on differences in the psychological characteristics among the three groups.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文