Antihypertensive effect of barnidipine 10 mg or amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in treatment-naive patients with essential hypertension: A 24-week, randomized, open-label, pilot study

被引:11
作者
Rossetti, Giuseppe [1 ]
Pizzocri, Samuele [1 ]
Brasca, Francesco [1 ]
Pozzi, Marta [1 ]
Beltrami, Laura M. [1 ]
Bolla, Giovanni B. [2 ]
Famiani, Roberta [1 ]
Caimi, Barbara [1 ]
Omboni, Stefano [3 ]
Magrini, Fabio [2 ]
Carugo, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ist Milanesi Martinitt & Stelline & Pio Albergo T, Azienda Serv Persona, UOC Cardiol 1, I-20146 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, IRCCS Policlin, Ctr Interuniv Fisiol Clin & Ipertens, I-20146 Milan, Italy
[3] Ist Italiano Telemed, Varese, Italy
来源
CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL | 2008年 / 69卷 / 03期
关键词
essential hypertension; ambulatory bloodpressure monitoring; barnidipine; amlodipine; left ventricular mass index; smoothness index;
D O I
10.1016/j.curtheres.2008.06.002
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are largely employed for the treatment of hypertension, coronary heart disease, and heart failure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the antihypertensive effect of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists barnidipine and amlodipine. METHODS: This was a 24-week, randomized, open-label, pilot study. Consecutive treatment-naive patients with grade I or II essential hypertension (office sitting systolic blood pressure [BP] of 140-179 mm Hg and diastolic BP of 90-109 mm Hg) were enrolled. The primary end points were the effect of treatment with either barnidipine 10 mg or amlodipine 5 mg once daily on office and ambulatory BP, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and markers of cardiac damage, serum procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide, and plasma amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations. Patients were assessed at enrollment, and 12 and 24 weeks. During each visit, the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) was also monitored using spontaneous reporting, patient interview, and physical examination, the relationship to study drug being determined by the investigators. Compliance with treatment was assessed at each study visit by counting returned tablets. RESULTS: Thirty eligible patients (20 men, 10 women; mean [SD] age, 47 [12] years) were included in the study; all patients completed the 24 weeks of study treatment. Twelve weeks after randomization, 6 patients in the amlodipine group had their dose doubled to 10 mg due to inadequate BP control. Mean BP reductions at study end were not significantly different between the barnidipine and amlodipine groups (office BP, -10.3/-9.4 vs -16.6/-9.1 mm Hg; ambulatory BP, 9.4/6.4 vs 8.1/5.1 mm Hg). Reductions in LVMI and markers of cardiac damage were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Significantly more patients in the amlodipine group reported drug-retated AEs compared with those in the barnidipine group (9 [60%] vs 2 [1390]; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this small sample of treatment-naive hypertensive patients, the anti hypertensive effect of barnidipine 10 mg once daily was not significantly different from that of amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 206
页数:15
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of Barnidipine 10 or 20 mg Plus Losartan 50-mg Combination Versus Losartan 100-mg Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Not Controlled by Losartan 50-mg Monotherapy: A 12-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study
    Parati, Gianfranco
    Giglio, Alessia
    Lonati, Laura
    Destro, Maurizio
    Ricci, Alessandra Rossi
    Cagnoni, Francesca
    Pini, Claudio
    Venco, Achille
    Maresca, Andrea Maria
    Monza, Michela
    Grandi, Anna Maria
    Omboni, Stefano
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (07) : 1270 - 1284
  • [2] The Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study of amlodipine 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who insufficiently responded to amlodipine 5 mg once daily
    T Fujiwara
    Y Ii
    J Hatsuzawa
    H Murase
    T Watanabe
    M Murakami
    N Kimura
    J Buch
    T Tsuchihashi
    T Saruta
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2009, 23 : 521 - 529
  • [3] The Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study of amlodipine 10mg once daily in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who insufficiently responded to amlodipine 5mg once daily
    Fujiwara, T.
    Ii, Y.
    Hatsuzawa, J.
    Murase, H.
    Watanabe, T.
    Murakami, M.
    Kimura, N.
    Buch, J.
    Tsuchihashi, T.
    Saruta, T.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2009, 23 (08) : 521 - 529
  • [4] An open-label, uncontrolled, 8-week clinical trial of barnidipine hydrochloride, a once-daily calcium channel blocker, in Korean patients with essential hypertension
    Bae, JH
    Lee, JJ
    Kwon, SH
    Kang, HS
    Choue, CW
    Kim, KS
    Kim, MS
    Song, JS
    Yamamoto, M
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1997, 58 (06): : 382 - 389
  • [5] The efficacy and long-term safety of a triple combination of 80 mg telmisartan, 5 mg amlodipine and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study with open-label extension
    Higaki, Jitsuo
    Komuro, Issei
    Shiki, Kosuke
    Ugai, Hiroyuki
    Taniguchi, Atsushi
    Ikeda, Hiroshi
    Kuroki, Daisuke
    Nishimura, Seiichiro
    Ogihara, Toshio
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2017, 40 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [6] The efficacy and long-term safety of a triple combination of 80 mg telmisartan, 5 mg amlodipine and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study with open-label extension
    Jitsuo Higaki
    Issei Komuro
    Kosuke Shiki
    Hiroyuki Ugai
    Atsushi Taniguchi
    Hiroshi Ikeda
    Daisuke Kuroki
    Seiichiro Nishimura
    Toshio Ogihara
    Hypertension Research, 2017, 40 : 51 - 60
  • [7] Long-Term Tolerability and Efficacy of Single-Pill Combinations of Telmisartan 40-80 mg Plus Amlodipine 5 or 10 mg in Patients Whose Blood Pressure Was Not Initially Controlled by Amlodipine 5-10 mg: Open-Label, Long-Term Follow-Ups of the TEAMSTA-5 and TEAMSTA-10 Studies
    Neldam, Steen
    Edwards, Colin
    Lang, Margreet
    Jones, Russell
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2012, 73 (1-2): : 65 - 84
  • [8] Comparative Efficacy and Safety Profile of Amlodipine 5 mg/Losartan 50 mg Fixed-Dose Combination and Amlodipine 10 mg Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients Who Respond Poorly to Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy: An 8-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III Noninferiority Study
    Kang, Seok-Min
    Youn, Jong-Chan
    Chae, Shung Chull
    Park, Chang Gyu
    Yang, Joo Young
    Kim, Moo Hyun
    Hong, Taek Jong
    Kim, Cheol Ho
    Kim, Jae Joong
    Shin, Dong Gu
    Jung, Jin Won
    Yoon, Jung Han
    Park, Si Hoon
    Kwon, Jun
    Cho, Seung Yun
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (12) : 1953 - 1963
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of 24 Weeks of Therapy with Bendroflumethiazide 1.25 mg/day or 2.5 mg/day and Potassium Chloride Compared with Enalapril 10 mg/day and Amlodipine 5 mg/day in Patients with Mild to Moderate Primary HypertensionA Multicentre, Randomised, Open Study
    S. Rasmussen
    N. Borrild
    J. Vang Andersen
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2006, 26 : 91 - 101
  • [10] Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Formulations of 10-mg Amlodipine Besylate: An Open-Label, Single-Dose, Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers
    Liu, Yun
    Jia, Jingying
    Liu, Gangyi
    Li, Shuijun
    Lu, Chuan
    Liu, Yanmei
    Yu, Chen
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 31 (04) : 777 - 783