Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass of Winter Wheat Based on Consumer-Grade Multi-Spectral UAV

被引:56
|
作者
Wang, Falv [1 ]
Yang, Mao [1 ]
Ma, Longfei [1 ]
Zhang, Tong [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Weilong [1 ]
Li, Wei [3 ]
Zhang, Yinghua [1 ,4 ]
Sun, Zhencai [1 ,4 ]
Wang, Zhimin [1 ,4 ]
Li, Fei [5 ]
Yu, Kang [6 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Hort, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[3] China Agr Univ, Coll Biol Sci, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[4] Engn Technol Res Ctr Agr Low Plain Areas, Cangzhou 061000, Peoples R China
[5] Inner Mongolia Agr Univ, Coll Grassland Resources & Environm, Hohhot 010011, Peoples R China
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Life Sci, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
unmanned aerial vehicle; winter wheat biomass; vegetation indices; machine learning; random forest regression; partial least squares regression; multiple growth stages; LEAF-AREA INDEX; HYPERSPECTRAL VEGETATION INDEXES; DIFFERENT GROWTH-STAGES; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; REMOTE ESTIMATION; SPECTRAL INDEXES; NITROGEN CONCENTRATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SQUARES REGRESSION; PADDY RICE;
D O I
10.3390/rs14051251
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the problems of optical remote sensing of crop above-ground biomass (AGB) is that vegetation indices (VIs) often saturate from the middle to late growth stages. This study focuses on combining VIs acquired by a consumer-grade multiple-spectral UAV and machine learning regression techniques to (i) determine the optimal time window for AGB estimation of winter wheat and to (ii) determine the optimal combination of multi-spectral VIs and regression algorithms. UAV-based multi-spectral data and manually measured AGB of winter wheat, under five nitrogen rates, were obtained from the jointing stage until 25 days after flowering in the growing season 2020/2021. Forty-four multi-spectral VIs were used in the linear regression (LR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), and random forest (RF) models in this study. Results of LR models showed that the heading stage was the most suitable stage for AGB prediction, with R-2 values varying from 0.48 to 0.93. Three PLSR models based on different datasets performed differently in estimating AGB in the training dataset (R-2 = 0.74~0.92, RMSE = 0.95~2.87 t/ha, MAE = 0.75~2.18 t/ha, and RPD = 2.00~3.67) and validation dataset (R-2 = 0.50~0.75, RMSE = 1.56~2.57 t/ha, MAE = 1.44~2.05 t/ha, RPD = 1.45~1.89). Compared with PLSR models, the performance of the RF models was more stable in the prediction of AGB in the training dataset (R-2 = 0.95~0.97, RMSE = 0.58~1.08 t/ha, MAE = 0.46~0.89 t/ha, and RPD = 3.95~6.35) and validation dataset (R-2 = 0.83~0.93, RMSE = 0.93~2.34 t/ha, MAE = 0.72~2.01 t/ha, RPD = 1.36~3.79). Monitoring AGB prior to flowering was found to be more effective than post-flowering. Moreover, this study demonstrates that it is feasible to estimate AGB for multiple growth stages of winter wheat by combining the optimal VIs and PLSR and RF models, which overcomes the saturation problem of using individual VI-based linear regression models.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimation of Winter Rapeseed Above-ground Biomass Based on UAV Multi-spectral Remote Sensing
    Wang H.
    Xiang Y.
    Li W.
    Shi H.
    Wang X.
    Zhao X.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2023, 54 (08): : 218 - 229
  • [2] Estimation of Leaf Area Index and Above-Ground Biomass of Winter Wheat Based on Optimal Spectral Index
    Tang, Zijun
    Guo, Jinjin
    Xiang, Youzhen
    Lu, Xianghui
    Wang, Qian
    Wang, Haidong
    Cheng, Minghui
    Wang, Han
    Wang, Xin
    An, Jiaqi
    Abdelghany, Ahmed
    Li, Zhijun
    Zhang, Fucang
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [3] Above-ground Biomass Wheat Estimation: Deep Learning with UAV-based RGB Images
    Schreiber, Lincoln Vinicius
    Atkinson Amorim, Joao Gustavo
    Guimaraes, Leticia
    Matos, Debora Motta
    da Costa, Celso Maciel
    Parraga, Adriane
    APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 36 (01)
  • [4] Estimating the maize above-ground biomass by constructing the tridimensional concept model based on UAV-based digital and multi-spectral images
    Shu Meiyan
    Shen Mengyuan
    Dong Qizhou
    Yang Xiaohong
    Li Baoguo
    Ma Yuntao
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2022, 282
  • [5] Faba bean above-ground biomass and bean yield estimation based on consumer-grade unmanned aerial vehicle RGB images and ensemble learning
    Yishan Ji
    Rong Liu
    Yonggui Xiao
    Yuxing Cui
    Zhen Chen
    Xuxiao Zong
    Tao Yang
    Precision Agriculture, 2023, 24 : 1439 - 1460
  • [6] Faba bean above-ground biomass and bean yield estimation based on consumer-grade unmanned aerial vehicle RGB images and ensemble learning
    Ji, Yishan
    Liu, Rong
    Xiao, Yonggui
    Cui, Yuxing
    Chen, Zhen
    Zong, Xuxiao
    Yang, Tao
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2023, 24 (04) : 1439 - 1460
  • [7] Estimation of Above-Ground Biomass and Chlorophyll Content of Different Alfalfa Varieties Based on UAV Multi -Spectrum
    Shen Si-cong
    Zhang Jing-xue
    Chen Ming-hui
    Li Zhi-wei
    Sun Sheng-nan
    Yan Xue-bing
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43 (12) : 3847 - 3852
  • [8] Estimate of winter-wheat above-ground biomass based on UAV ultrahigh-ground-resolution image textures and vegetation indices
    Yue, Jibo
    Yang, Guijun
    Tian, Qingjiu
    Feng, Haikuan
    Xu, Kaijian
    Zhou, Chengquan
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 150 : 226 - 244
  • [9] Research on Rapeseed Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Based on Spectral and LiDAR Data
    Jiang, Yihan
    Wu, Fang
    Zhu, Shaolong
    Zhang, Weijun
    Wu, Fei
    Yang, Tianle
    Yang, Guanshuo
    Zhao, Yuanyuan
    Sun, Chengming
    Liu, Tao
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [10] Estimation of Potato Plant Height and Above-ground Biomass Based on UAV Hyperspectral Images
    Liu Y.
    Feng H.
    Huang J.
    Sun Q.
    Yang F.
    Yang G.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52 (02): : 188 - 198