Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial

被引:180
作者
Lu, Michael T. [1 ,2 ]
Ferencik, Maros [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roberts, Rhonda S. [4 ]
Lee, Kerry L. [4 ]
Ivanov, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Adami, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ]
Mark, Daniel B. [4 ]
Jaffer, Farouc A. [1 ,2 ]
Leipsic, Jonathon A. [5 ,6 ]
Douglas, Pamela S. [4 ]
Hoffmann, Udo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[5] St Pauls Hosp, Dept Radiol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
computational fluid dynamics; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; coronary computed tomography angiography; fractional flow reserve; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY-DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; UNITED-STATES; INTERVENTION; STANDARD; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFRCT) predicts coronary revascularization and outcomes and whether its addition improves efficiency of referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) after coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). BACKGROUND FFRCT may improve the efficiency of an anatomic CTA strategy for stable chest pain. METHODS This observational cohort study included patients with stable chest pain in the PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial referred to ICA within 90 days after CTA. FFRCT was measured at a blinded core laboratory, and FFRCT results were unavailable to caregivers. We determined the agreement of FFRCT (positive if <= 0.80) with stenosis on CTA and ICA (positive if >= 50% left main or >= 70% other coronary artery), and predictive value for a composite of coronary revascularization or major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina). We retrospectively assessed whether adding FFRCT <= 0.80 as a gatekeeper could improve efficiency of referral to ICA, defined as decreased rate of ICA without >= 50% stenosis and increased ICA leading to revascularization. RESULTS FFRCT was calculated in 67% (181 of 271) of eligible patients (mean age 62 years; 36% women). FFRCT was discordant with stenosis in 31% (57 of 181) for CTA and 29% (52 of 181) for ICA. Most patients undergoing coronary revascularization had an FFRCT of <= 0.80 (91%; 80 of 88). An FFRCT of <= 0.80 was a significantly better predictor for revascularization or major adverse cardiac events than severe CTA stenosis (HR: 4.3 [95% confidence interval [ CI]: 2.4 to 8.9] vs. 2.9 [95% CI: 1.8 to 5.1]; p = 0.033). Reserving ICA for patients with an FFRCT of <= 0.80 could decrease ICA without >= 50% stenosis by 44%, and increase the proportion of ICA leading to revascularization by 24%. CONCLUSIONS In this hypothesis-generating study of patients with stable chest pain referred to ICA from CTA, an FFRCT of <= 0.80 was a better predictor of revascularization or major adverse cardiac events than severe stenosis on CTA. Adding FFRCT may improve efficiency of referral to ICA from CTA alone. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1350 / 1358
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abbara Suhny, 2009, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, V3, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.03.004
[2]   Diagnostic Performance of 64-Multidetector Row Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Individuals Without Known Coronary Artery Disease [J].
Budoff, Matthew J. ;
Dowe, David ;
Jollis, James G. ;
Gitter, Michael ;
Sutherland, John ;
Halamert, Edward ;
Scherer, Markus ;
Bellinger, Raye ;
Martin, Arthur ;
Benton, Robert ;
Delago, Augustin ;
Min, James K. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (21) :1724-1732
[3]   CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard [J].
Budoff, Matthew J. ;
Nakazato, Ryo ;
Mancini, G. B. John ;
Gransar, Heidi ;
Leipsic, Jonathon ;
Berman, Daniel S. ;
Min, James K. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2016, 9 (05) :559-564
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]   Contemporary Patterns of Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Use Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry [J].
Dattilo, Philip B. ;
Prasad, Anand ;
Honeycutt, Emily ;
Wang, Tracy Y. ;
Messenger, John C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (22) :2337-2339
[6]   Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI for Stable Coronary Artery Disease [J].
De Bruyne, Bernard ;
Fearon, William F. ;
Pijls, Nico H. J. ;
Barbato, Emanuele ;
Tonino, Pim ;
Piroth, Zsolt ;
Jagic, Nikola ;
Mobius-Winckler, Sven ;
Rioufol, Gilles ;
Witt, Nils ;
Kala, Petr ;
MacCarthy, Philip ;
Engstroem, Thomas ;
Oldroyd, Keith ;
Mavromatis, Kreton ;
Manoharan, Ganesh ;
Verlee, Peter ;
Frobert, Ole ;
Curzen, Nick ;
Johnson, Jane B. ;
Limacher, Andreas ;
Nueesch, Eveline ;
Jueni, Peter .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (13) :1208-1217
[7]   Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRCT: outcome and resource impacts study [J].
Douglas, Pamela S. ;
Pontone, Gianluca ;
Hlatky, Mark A. ;
Patel, Manesh R. ;
Norgaard, Bjarne L. ;
Byrne, Robert A. ;
Curzen, Nick ;
Purcell, Ian ;
Gutberlet, Matthias ;
Rioufol, Gilles ;
Hink, Ulrich ;
Schuchlenz, Herwig Walter ;
Feuchtner, Gudrun ;
Gilard, Martine ;
Andreini, Daniele ;
Jensen, Jesper M. ;
Hadamitzky, Martin ;
Chiswell, Karen ;
Cyr, Derek ;
Wilk, Alan ;
Wang, Furong ;
Rogers, Campbell ;
De Bruyne, Bernard .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (47) :3359-3367
[8]   Outcomes of Anatomical versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease [J].
Douglas, Pamela S. ;
Hoffmann, Udo ;
Patel, Manesh R. ;
Mark, Daniel B. ;
Al-Khalidi, Hussein R. ;
Cavanaugh, Brendan ;
Cole, Jason ;
Dolor, Rowena J. ;
Fordyce, Christopher B. ;
Huang, Megan ;
Khan, Muhammad Akram ;
Kosinski, Andrzej S. ;
Krucoff, Mitchell W. ;
Malhotra, Vinay ;
Picard, Michael H. ;
Udelson, James E. ;
Velazquez, Eric J. ;
Yow, Eric ;
Cooper, Lawton S. ;
Lee, Kerry L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (14) :1291-1300
[9]  
Fihn SD, 2012, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V60, pE44, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.013
[10]   Coronary CT Angiography versus Standard Evaluation in Acute Chest Pain [J].
Hoffmann, Udo ;
Truong, Quynh A. ;
Schoenfeld, David A. ;
Chou, Eric T. ;
Woodard, Pamela K. ;
Nagurney, John T. ;
Pope, J. Hector ;
Hauser, Thomas H. ;
White, Charles S. ;
Weiner, Scott G. ;
Kalanjian, Shant ;
Mullins, Michael E. ;
Mikati, Issam ;
Peacock, W. Frank ;
Zakroysky, Pearl ;
Hayden, Douglas ;
Goehler, Alexander ;
Lee, Hang ;
Gazelle, G. Scott ;
Wiviott, Stephen D. ;
Fleg, Jerome L. ;
Udelson, James E. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (04) :299-308