The effect of mental load on psychophysical and visual evoked potential visual acuity

被引:6
作者
Mahjoob, Monireh [1 ]
Shandiz, Javad Heravian [2 ]
Anderson, Andrew J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Zahedan Univ Med Sci, Rehabil Fac, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Dept Optometry, Zahedan, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Refract Eye Res Ctr, Sch Paramed Sci, Dept Optometry, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Parkville, Vic, Australia
关键词
mental load; n-back task; visual acuity; visual evoked potential; ATTENTION; SIZE;
D O I
10.1111/opo.12955
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose Under real-world conditions, tasks dependent on visual acuity may need to be performed in the presence of a mental load arising from concurrent, non-visual tasks. Therefore, measuring visual acuity concurrently with mentally demanding tasks may reflect a patient's vision more accurately. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of task-induced mental load on high contrast visual acuity, as measured using a letter chart and estimated via sweep visual evoked potentials (sweep VEP). Methods Visual acuity was determined using the Freiburg Vision Test, and also using sweep VEP tested stepwise, from coarse to fine, over 13 spatial frequencies, in 31 healthy participants (aged 22.4 +/- 3.6 years). Recordings were repeated while participants concurrently performed an auditory 2-back task. Mental load of the n-back task was confirmed through subjective ratings. Results Visual acuity determined with the Freiburg Vision Test worsened from -0.02 +/- 0.12 to 0.04 +/- 0.15 logMAR under mental load (p = 0.03). Visual acuities estimated by sweep VEPs worsened from 0.38 +/- 0.1 to 0.47 +/- 0.1 logMAR (p < 0.001). While the slope of the VEP amplitude versus spatial frequency function steepened significantly with mental load (p = 0.01), VEP noise levels were not significantly affected (p = 0.07). Conclusion Visual acuity reduces significantly with a concurrent task that produces mental load. At least part of this reduction appears to be related to alterations in responses within the visual cortex, rather than being purely attributable to higher-level distraction effects.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 593
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error [J].
Applegate, RA ;
Ballentine, C ;
Gross, H ;
Sarver, EJ ;
Sarver, CA .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (02) :97-105
[2]   Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement [J].
Carrasco, M ;
Penpeci-Talgar, C ;
Eckstein, M .
VISION RESEARCH, 2000, 40 (10-12) :1203-1215
[3]   Automatic gain control contrast mechanisms are modulated by attention in humans: evidence from visual evoked potentials [J].
Di Russo, F ;
Spinelli, D ;
Morrone, MC .
VISION RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (19) :2435-2447
[4]   Electrophysiological evidence for an early attentional mechanism in visual processing in humans [J].
Di Russo, F ;
Spinelli, D .
VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (18) :2975-2985
[5]   MENTAL CONCENTRATION AND THE PATTERN REVERSAL VISUAL EVOKED-RESPONSE [J].
DOUTHWAITE, WA ;
CONNOR, H .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1989, 66 (01) :61-65
[6]   Task-induced Changes in Idiopathic Infantile Nystagmus Vary with Gaze [J].
Fadardi, Marzieh Salehi ;
Bathke, Arne C. ;
Harrar, Solomon W. ;
Abel, Larry Allen .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2017, 94 (05) :606-615
[7]   VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review [J].
Hamilton, Ruth ;
Bach, Michael ;
Heinrich, Sven P. ;
Hoffmann, Michael B. ;
Odom, J. Vernon ;
McCulloch, Daphne L. ;
Thompson, Dorothy A. .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2021, 142 (01) :25-74
[8]  
Johnson ML, 2000, METHOD ENZYMOL, V321, P424
[9]   Effect of pupil size on uncorrected visual acuity in astigmatic eyes [J].
Kamiya, Kazutaka ;
Kobashi, Hidenaga ;
Shimizu, Kimiya ;
Kawamorita, Takushi ;
Uozato, Hiroshi .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 96 (02) :267-270
[10]   Spatial Attention Modulates Initial Afferent Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex [J].
Kelly, Simon P. ;
Gomez-Ramirez, Manuel ;
Foxe, John J. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2008, 18 (11) :2629-2636