Understanding producers' motives for adopting sustainable practices: the role of expected rewards, risk perception and risk tolerance

被引:101
作者
Trujillo-Barrera, Andres [1 ]
Pennings, Joost M. E. [1 ,2 ]
Hofenk, Dianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
motivation for adoption of sustainability; risk perception; risk tolerance; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PROBING INTERACTIONS; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; FARMERS ADOPTION; BEHAVIOR; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES; MARKET; US;
D O I
10.1093/erae/jbv038
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Understanding the motives and risk attitudes of producers to engage in sustainable practices is important for policy-makers who wish to increase the likelihood of adoption and improve the design of incentives. This article examines the underlying motives of producers to adopt sustainable practices. We focus on expected economic, social and personal rewards and analyse the role of producers' financial risk perception and risk tolerance. Results from personal interviews with 164 hog producers show that the adoption of sustainable practices is affected by expected economic rewards but not by social and personal rewards. Further, while perceived risk is a barrier to the adoption of sustainable practices, risk tolerance is a positive moderator of the relationship between economic rewards and adoption. In addition, perceived tax benefits and turnover have a significant positive relationship with adoption, while education and age do not play a role.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 382
页数:24
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[2]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[3]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[4]   Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. ;
Yi, Youjae .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) :8-34
[5]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[6]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736
[7]   Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (03) :373-400
[8]   Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers' risk behaviour from field-experiment data [J].
Bocqueho, Geraldine ;
Jacquet, Florence ;
Reynaud, Arnaud .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) :135-172
[9]  
Boiral O., 2015, BUSINESS SO IN PRESS
[10]   Economic Factors Affecting Diversified Farming Systems [J].
Bowman, Maria S. ;
Zilberman, David .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01)