Sponsoring actionable science: what public science funders can do to advance sustainability and the social contract for science

被引:60
|
作者
Arnott, James C. [1 ,2 ]
Kirchhoff, Christine J. [3 ]
Meyer, Ryan M. [4 ]
Meadow, Alison M. [5 ]
Bednarek, Angela T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Aspen Global Change Inst, Basalt, CO 81621 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Storrs, CT USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Community & Citizen Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Inst Environm, Tucson, AZ USA
[6] Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
POLICY; KNOWLEDGE; TRANSDISCIPLINARY; COPRODUCTION; IMPACTS; LESSONS; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Producing actionable science to inform decisions on sustainability is an important opportunity for science to serve society and fulfill expectations that come along with public financial support. In turn, how public science funding is managed may help spur different ways of doing science that are better suited to linking kscience with sustainability action. This review identifies opportunities for science funding program management to bolster the generation of actionable science through different approaches to solicitation design, review processes, implementation support, and evaluation. To understand more about this opportunity space, we argue for a more interactive, iterative, and evaluation-centered approach to the study and practice of public science funding program management.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 44
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pens and purse strings: Exploring the opportunities and limits to funding actionable sustainability science
    Arnott, James C.
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2021, 50 (10)
  • [2] Do the science on sustainability now
    Nature, 2022, 610 : 605 - 606
  • [3] Do the science on sustainability now
    Bolsonaro, Jair
    NATURE, 2022, 610 (7933) : 605 - 606
  • [4] Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?
    Bonney, Rick
    Phillips, Tina B.
    Ballard, Heidi L.
    Enck, Jody W.
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (01) : 2 - 16
  • [5] What is Social Science Microsimulation?
    Spielauer, Martin
    SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2011, 29 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [6] What can energy research bring to social science? Reflections on 5 years of Energy Research & Social Science and beyond
    Van Veelen, Bregje
    Pinker, Annabel
    Tingey, Margaret
    Aiken, Gerald Taylor
    Eadson, Will
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 57
  • [7] Rationalizing Science: A Comparative Study of Public, Industry, and Nonprofit Research Funders
    Weinryb, Noomi
    Blomgren, Maria
    Wedlin, Linda
    MINERVA, 2018, 56 (04) : 405 - 429
  • [8] Examining Open Innovation in Science (OIS): what Open Innovation can and cannot offer the science of science
    Beck, Susanne
    LaFlamme, Marcel
    Bergenholtz, Carsten
    Bogers, Marcel
    Brasseur, Tiare-Maria
    Conradsen, Marie-Louise
    Crowston, Kevin
    Di Marco, Diletta
    Effert, Agnes
    Filiou, Despoina
    Frederiksen, Lars
    Gillier, Thomas
    Gruber, Marc
    Haeussler, Carolin
    Hoisl, Karin
    Kokshagina, Olga
    Norn, Maria-Theresa
    Poetz, Marion
    Pruschak, Gernot
    Priego, Laia Pujol
    Radziwon, Agnieszka
    Ruser, Alexander
    Sauermann, Henry
    Shah, Sonali K.
    Suess-Reyes, Julia
    Tucci, Christopher L.
    Tuertscher, Philipp
    Vedel, Jane Bjorn
    Verganti, Roberto
    Wareham, Jonathan
    Xu, Sunny Mosangzi
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 25 (03): : 221 - 235
  • [9] "Science: What's It Up To?" The Daily Show and the Social Construction of Science
    Brewer, Paul R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2013, 7 : 452 - 470
  • [10] The Science of Social Work: Public Perceptions
    LeCroy, Craig W.
    Kaplan, Tamar
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SOCIAL WORK AND RESEARCH, 2022,