Why Do People Work in Public Health? Exploring Recruitment and Retention Among Public Health Workers

被引:21
作者
Yeager, Valerie A. [1 ]
Wisniewski, Janna M. [1 ]
Amos, Kathleen [2 ]
Bialek, Ron [2 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Global Hlth Management & Policy, 1440 Canal St,Suite 1900, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Publ Hlth Fdn, Washington, DC USA
关键词
organizational environment; recruitment; retention; workforce; WORKFORCE;
D O I
10.1097/PHH.0000000000000380
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Context: The public health workforce is critical to the functioning of the public health system and protection of the population's health. Ensuring a sufficient workforce depends on effectively recruiting and retaining workers. Objective: This study examines factors influencing decisions to take and remain in jobs within public health, particularly for workers employed in governmental public health. Design: This cross-sectional study employed a secondary data set from a 2010 national survey of US public health workers. Participants: Survey respondents were included in this study if they responded to at least 1 survey item related to recruitment and retention. A total of 10 859 survey responses fit this criterion. Main Outcome Measures: Data examined demographics of public health workers and factors that influenced decisions to take jobs in and remain in public health. Results: Job security (beta = 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.56) and competitive benefits (beta = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.70) were significantly and positively associated with governmental employees' decisions to take positions with their current employers compared with public health workers employed by other types of organizations. The same finding held with regard to retention: job security (beta = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.57) and competitive benefits (beta = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.24-0.83). Two personal factors, personal commitment to public service (beta = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17-0.42) and wanted a job in the public health field (beta = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.18-0.69), were significantly and positively related to governmental employees deciding to remain with their current employers. Conclusions: It is important to recognize the value of competitive benefits for both current and potential employees. Public health agencies should maintain these if possible and make the value of these benefits known to policy makers or other agencies setting these benefit policies. Job security associated with governmental public health jobs also appears to offer public health an advantage in recruiting and retaining employees.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 566
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Association of Schools of Public Health, 2008, CONFR PUBL HLTH WORK
  • [2] Association of Schools of Public Health, 2012, ANN DAT REP 2011
  • [3] Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, 2006, HIR STRAT STAT HLTH
  • [4] Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, 2004, STAT PUBL HLTH EMPL
  • [5] Building an Effective Workforce A Systematic Review of Public Health Workforce Literature
    Beck, Angela J.
    Boulton, Matthew L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (05) : S6 - S16
  • [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013, MOD WORKF PUBL HLTH
  • [7] Council on Linkages Between Academia and Public Health Practice, 2015, RECR RET WHATS INFL
  • [8] Job Satisfaction: A Critical, Understudied Facet of Workforce Development in Public Health
    Harper, Elizabeth
    Castrucci, Brian C.
    Bharthapudi, Kiran
    Sellers, Katie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2015, 21 : S46 - S55
  • [9] Public Health Workforce Research in Review A 25-Year Retrospective
    Hilliard, Tracy M.
    Boulton, Matthew L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (05) : S17 - S28
  • [10] Loving and Leaving Public Health: Predictors of Intentions to Quit Among State Health Agency Workers
    Liss-Levinson, Rivka
    Bharthapudi, Kiran
    Leider, Jonathon P.
    Sellers, Katie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2015, 21 : S91 - S101