Assessment of Transepidermal Water Loss From the Ocular Area in Dry Eye Disease

被引:8
作者
Jeon, Hyun Sun [1 ]
Youn, Sang Woong [2 ]
Jeon, Hee Eun [1 ]
Kim, Joo Hyun [1 ]
Hyon, Joon Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Coll Med, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Dermatol, Bundang Hosp, Seongnam, South Korea
关键词
dry eye disease; tear evaporation; tewameter; transepidermal water loss; TEAR EVAPORATION RATES; MEIBOMIAN GLAND DYSFUNCTION; FILM OSMOLARITY; EXPRESSION; DIAGNOSIS; HUMIDITY; CHAMBER; DEVICE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.16-20109
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To investigate transepidermal water loss (TEWL) from the ocular area in dry eye disease (DED) and evaluate the correlation between ocular TEWL and other DED parameters. METHODS. Transepidermal water loss from the ocular area in 56 eyes with DED and 38 healthy eyes was measured using a Tewameter TM300 that was equipped with custom made goggles (measuring temperature 24 degrees C-26 degrees C and relative humidity 35%-45%). The DED group was classified into two subgroups, aqueous deficient dry eye (ADDE) and evaporative dry eye (EDE). Correlations between ocular TEWL and other DED parameters, such as tear osmolarity, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining, conjunctival staining, Schirmer I test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and Visual Analogue Scale score were evaluated. RESULTS. Ocular TEWL was significantly higher in the DED group (63.0 +/- 12.2 g/h/m(2)) than in the control group (54.7 +/- 14.2 g/h/m(2); P < 0.003). Although there was no significant difference, TEWL was higher in the ADDE subgroup (64.0 +/- 10.7 g/h/m(2)) compared with the EDE subgroup (61.1 +/- 14.9 g/h/m(2)). Tear break-up time, corneal staining score, and OSDI were significantly correlated with ocular TEWL (P < 0.05) in all participants. Ocular TEWL loss was negatively correlated with Schirmer I test value in the DED group. CONCLUSIONS. Ocular TEWL was significantly higher in DED patients compared with controls, reflecting higher tear evaporation in DED patients. Patients who have shorter Schirmer I test values tend to have higher TEWL values. Not only EDE but also ADDE patients may have increased tear evaporation.
引用
收藏
页码:4831 / 4836
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Validating a new device for measuring tear evaporation rates [J].
Rohit, Athira ;
Ehrmann, Klaus ;
Naduvilath, Thomas ;
Willcox, Mark ;
Stapleton, Fiona .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2014, 34 (01) :53-62
[22]   TEAR EVAPORIMETER FOR MEASURING WATER EVAPORATION RATE FROM THE TEAR FILM UNDER CONTROLLED CONDITIONS IN HUMANS [J].
ROLANDO, M ;
REFOJO, MF .
EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 1983, 36 (01) :25-33
[23]  
ROLANDO M, 1983, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V101, P557
[24]   Meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Sjogren syndrome [J].
Shimazaki, J ;
Goto, E ;
Ono, M ;
Shimmura, S ;
Tsubota, K .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (08) :1485-1488
[25]   An Objective Approach to Dry Eye Disease Severity [J].
Sullivan, Benjamin D. ;
Whitmer, Diane ;
Nichols, Kelly K. ;
Tomlinson, Alan ;
Foulks, Gary N. ;
Geerling, Gerd ;
Pepose, Jay S. ;
Kosheleff, Valerie ;
Porreco, Allison ;
Lemp, Michael A. .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (12) :6125-6130
[26]   Tear film osmolarity: Determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis [J].
Tomlinson, Alan ;
Khanal, Santosh ;
Ramaesh, Kanna ;
Diaper, Charles ;
McFadyen, Angus .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (10) :4309-4315
[27]   EFFECT OF ARTIFICIAL TEAR SOLUTIONS AND SALINE ON TEAR FILM EVAPORATION [J].
TREES, GR ;
TOMLINSON, A .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1990, 67 (12) :886-890
[28]  
TSUBOTA K, 1992, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V33, P2942
[29]   Performance of Tear Osmolarity Compared to Previous Diagnostic Tests for Dry Eye Diseases [J].
Versura, P. ;
Profazio, V. ;
Campos, E. C. .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2010, 35 (07) :553-564
[30]   Assessment and Impact of the Time of Day on Aqueous Tear Evaporation in Normal Subjects [J].
Wojtowicz, Jadwiga C. ;
McCulley, James P. .
EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 35 (03) :117-119