Development of a tool to assess beliefs about mythical causes of cancer: the Cancer Awareness Measure Mythical Causes Scale

被引:26
作者
Smith, Samuel G. [1 ,2 ]
Beard, Emma [2 ,3 ]
McGowan, Jennifer A. [2 ]
Fox, Emma [4 ]
Cook, Chloe [5 ]
Pal, Radhika [2 ]
Waller, Jo [2 ]
Shahab, Lion [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, London, England
[3] UCL, Res Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, London, England
[4] Northwestern Univ, Div Gen Internal Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Shift Design, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; PUBLIC AWARENESS; BREAST-CANCER; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022825
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives We aimed to develop a reliable and valid measure to assess public beliefs in mythical causes of cancer: the Cancer Awareness Measure-MYthical Causes Scale (CAM-MYCS). Design and setting Cancer myth items were generated from a literature review, social media and interviews (n=16). The CAM-MYCS was prepared by reducing items using (a) an online sample (n=527) with exploratory factor analysis and (b) cancer experts with Delhpi methodology (n=13). To assess test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change, students (n=91) completed the CAM-MYCS at baseline and 1 week after exposure to information on lifestyle-related cancer causes or control information. Construct validity was tested by comparing CAM-MYCS scores between cancer experts (n=25) and students (n=91). Factor structure and internal reliability were investigated in a national sample (n=1993). Results Out of 42 items generated, 12 were retained based on factor loadings, prevalence of endorsement and expert consensus. CAM-MYCS scores improved (fewer myths endorsed) among students exposed to information on cancer causes compared with the control group (p<0.001) and showed high test-retest reliability (r=0.90, p<0.001). Cancer experts reported higher CAM-MYCS scores (fewer myths endorsed) than students (p<0.001). The factor structure of the CAM-MYCS was confirmed in the national sample and internal reliability was high (alpha=0.86). Inclusion of the CAM-MYCS alongside items assessing knowledge of actual cancer causes did not affect responses. Conclusions The CAM-MYCS tool is a reliable and valid tool assessing beliefs in mythical causes of cancer, and it can be used alongside items assessing known causes of cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: measure development and results from a population survey in the UK
    Laura Boswell
    Jenny Harris
    Athena Ip
    Jessica Russell
    Georgia B Black
    Katriina L Whitaker
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [42] Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients
    Mao, Jun J.
    Palmer, Steve C.
    Desai, Krupali
    Li, Susan Q.
    Armstrong, Katrina
    Xie, Sharon X.
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 2012
  • [43] "I don't know what I'm feeling for": young women's beliefs about breast cancer risk and experiences of breast awareness
    Hindmarch, Sarah
    Gorman, Louise
    Hawkes, Rhiannon E. E.
    Howell, Sacha J. J.
    French, David P. P.
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [44] “I don’t know what I’m feeling for”: young women’s beliefs about breast cancer risk and experiences of breast awareness
    Sarah Hindmarch
    Louise Gorman
    Rhiannon E. Hawkes
    Sacha J. Howell
    David P. French
    BMC Women's Health, 23
  • [45] Development and validation of the NCC-BC-A scale to assess patient-reported outcomes for breast cancer patients in China
    Ma, Fei
    Yan, Xiaoyan
    Guan, Xiuwen
    Liu, Tianmou
    CANCER INNOVATION, 2024, 3 (06):
  • [46] Novel Interactive Tool for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment (Bright Pink Assess Your Risk): Development and Usability Study
    Hibler, Elizabeth A.
    Fought, Angela J.
    Kershaw, Kiarri N.
    Molsberry, Rebecca
    Nowakowski, Virginia
    Lindner, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (02)
  • [47] The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale: Development and Validation of the General Measure (Reprinted from vol 11, pg 570, 1993)
    Cella, David F.
    Tulsky, David S.
    Gray, George
    Sarafian, Bernie
    Linn, Elizabeth
    Bonomi, Amy
    Silberman, Margaret
    Yellen, Suzanne B.
    Winicour, Pasty
    Brannon, Judy
    Eckberg, Karen
    Lloyd, Stephen
    Purl, Sandy
    Blendowski, Carol
    Goodman, Michelle
    Stewart, Irene
    McHale, Marnie
    Bonomi, Philip
    Kaplan, Edward
    Taylor, Samuek
    Thomas, Charles R.
    Harris, Jules
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (35) : 5335 - 5344
  • [48] Asking the "Right" Questions about Financial Hardship: Using Cognitive Interviews with Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Caregivers to Inform Measure Development
    Salsman, John M.
    Nightingale, Chandylen L.
    Canzona, Mollie R.
    Howard, Dianna S.
    Tucker-Seeley, Reginald D.
    Wiseman, Kimberly D.
    Victorson, David E.
    Robles, Joanna M.
    Roth, Michael
    Smith, Regina
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Danhauer, Suzanne C.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13 (05) : 760 - 767
  • [49] Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior of Turkish Women about Breast Cancer and Breast Self-Examination According to a Turkish Version of the Champion Health Belief Model Scale
    Erbil, Nulufer
    Bolukbas, Nurgul
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (11) : 5823 - 5828
  • [50] Development of the Partner Version of the Self-Efficacy to Communicate about Sex and Intimacy (SECSI-PV) Scale in the Context of Cancer Survivorship
    Acquati, Chiara
    Chen, Qi
    Arthur, Elizabeth K.
    Reese, Jennifer B.
    Gorman, Jessica R.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 43 (03) : 337 - 355