Auto-calibration of GF-1 WFV images using flat terrain

被引:18
作者
Zhang, Guo [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Kai [1 ]
Huang, Wenchao [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying Mapping & R, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Geospatial Technol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Distortion detection; Elevation residual; Flat terrain; Gaofen-1; Wide-field-view camera; SELF-CALIBRATION; GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.10.009
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Four wide field view (WFV) cameras with 16-m multispectral medium-resolution and a combined swath of 800 km are onboard the Gaofen-1 (GF-1) satellite, which can increase the revisit frequency to less than 4 days and enable large-scale land monitoring. The detection and elimination of WFV camera distortions is key for subsequent applications. Due to the wide swath of WFV images, geometric calibration using either conventional methods based on the ground control field (GCF) or GCF independent methods is problematic. This is predominantly because current GCF5 in China fail to cover the whole WFV image and most GCF independent methods are used for close-range photogrammetry or computer vision fields. This study proposes an auto-calibration method using flat terrain to detect nonlinear distortions of GF-1 WFV images. First, a classic geometric calibration model is built for the GF1 WFV camera, and at least two images with an overlap area that cover flat terrain are collected, then the elevation residuals between the real elevation and that calculated by forward intersection are used to solve nonlinear distortion parameters in WFV images. Experiments demonstrate that the orientation accuracy of the proposed method evaluated by GCF CPs is within 0.6 pixel, and residual errors manifest as random errors. Validation using Google Earth CPs further proves the effectiveness of auto-calibration, and the whole scene is undistorted compared to not using calibration parameters. The orientation accuracy of the proposed method and the GCF method is compared. The maximum difference is approximately 0.3 pixel, and the factors behind this discrepancy are analyzed. Generally, this method can effectively compensate for distortions in the GF-1 WFV camera. (C) 2017 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 69
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SPACECR RECOVERY REM
[2]  
Bai Z. G., 2013, AEROSP CHIN, V14, P11
[3]   SPOTS HRG and HRS first in-flight geometric quality results [J].
Bouillon, A ;
Breton, E ;
De Lussy, F ;
Gaehet, R .
SENSORS, SYSTEMS AND NEXT-GENERATION SATELLITES VI, 2003, 4881 :212-223
[4]  
Bouillon A., 2003, GEOSC REM SENS S 200, V301, P303
[5]  
Delvit JM, 2012, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V39-B1, P525
[6]   A Self-Calibration Bundle Adjustment Method for Photogrammetric Processing of Chang'E-2 Stereo Lunar Imagery [J].
Di, Kaichang ;
Liu, Yiliang ;
Liu, Bin ;
Peng, Man ;
Hu, Wenmin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 52 (09) :5432-5442
[7]  
Faugeras O.D., 1992, CAMERA SELF CALIBRAT
[8]   Insights into the affine model for high-resolution satellite sensor orientation [J].
Fraser, CS ;
Yamakawa, T .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 58 (5-6) :275-288
[9]   Bias compensation in rational functions for Ikonos satellite imagery [J].
Fraser, CS ;
Hanley, HB .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 69 (01) :53-57
[10]  
Greslou D., 2006, REMOTE SENSING SPATI, P18