Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Shock Detection

被引:3
|
作者
Pinevich, Yuliya [1 ]
Amos-Binks, Adam [2 ]
Burris, Christie S. [2 ]
Rule, Gregory [2 ]
Bogojevic, Marija [3 ]
Flint, Isaac [2 ]
Pickering, Brian W. [1 ]
Nemeth, Christopher P. [2 ]
Herasevich, Vitaly [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Appl Res Associates, Albuquerque, NM 87110 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
SEPSIS; CARE; INFORMATICS; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; NEED;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usab220
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to test in real time a Trauma Triage, Treatment, and Training Decision Support (4TDS) machine learning (ML) model of shock detection in a prospective silent trial, and to evaluate specificity, sensitivity, and other estimates of diagnostic performance compared to the gold standard of electronic medical records (EMRs) review. Design: We performed a single-center diagnostic performance study. Patients and setting: A prospective cohort consisted of consecutive patients aged 18 years and older who were admitted from May 1 through September 30, 2020 to six Mayo Clinic intensive care units (ICUs) and five progressive care units. Measurements and main results: During the study time, 5,384 out of 6,630 hospital admissions were eligible. During the same period, the 4TDS shock model sent 825 alerts and 632 were eligible. Among 632 hospital admissions with alerts, 287 were screened positive and 345 were negative. Among 4,752 hospital admissions without alerts, 78 were screened positive and 4,674 were negative. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the 4TDS shock model was 0.86 (95% CI 0.85-0.87%). The 4TDS shock model demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.6% (95% CI 74.1-82.7%) and a specificity of 93.1% (95% CI 92.4-93.8%). The model showed a positive predictive value of 45.4% (95% CI 42.6-48.3%) and a negative predictive value of 98.4% (95% CI 98-98.6%). Conclusions: We successfully validated an ML model to detect circulatory shock in a prospective observational study. The model used only vital signs and showed moderate performance compared to the gold standard of clinician EMR review when applied to an ICU patient cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 88
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEVELOPMENT OF A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR EARLY SHOCK DETECTION
    Pinevich, Yuliya
    Amos-Binks, Adam
    Burris, Christie
    Rule, Gregory
    Lowe, Ryan
    Pickering, Brian
    Nemeth, Christopher
    Herasevich, Vitaly
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48
  • [2] Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Detection of Untreated Infection
    Buell, Kevin G.
    Carey, Kyle A.
    Dussault, Nicole
    Parker, William F.
    Dumanian, Jay
    Bhavani, Sivasubramanium V.
    Gilbert, Emily R.
    Winslow, Christopher J.
    Shah, Nirav S.
    Afshar, Majid
    Edelson, Dana P.
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2024, 6 (10)
  • [3] Development and validation of a machine learning model integrated with the clinical workflow for early detection of sepsis
    Mahyoub, Mohammed A.
    Yadav, Ravi R.
    Dougherty, Kacie
    Shukla, Ajit
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [4] Development and multi-center validation of machine learning model for early detection of fungal keratitis
    Wei, Zhenyu
    Wang, Shigeng
    Wang, Zhiqun
    Zhang, Yang
    Chen, Kexin
    Gong, Lan
    Li, Guigang
    Zheng, Qinxiang
    Zhang, Qin
    He, Yan
    Zhang, Qi
    Chen, Di
    Cao, Kai
    Pang, Jinding
    Zhang, Zijun
    Wang, Leying
    Ou, Zhonghong
    Liang, Qingfeng
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2023, 88
  • [5] LiSep LSTM: A Machine Learning Algorithm for Early Detection of Septic Shock
    Josef Fagerström
    Magnus Bång
    Daniel Wilhelms
    Michelle S. Chew
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [6] LiSep LSTM: A Machine Learning Algorithm for Early Detection of Septic Shock
    Fagerstrom, Josef
    Bang, Magnus
    Wilhelms, Daniel
    Chew, Michelle S.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [7] Machine learning for early detection of sepsis: an internal and temporal validation study
    Bedoya, Armando D.
    Futoma, Joseph
    Clement, Meredith E.
    Corey, Kristin
    Brajer, Nathan
    Lin, Anthony
    Simons, Morgan G.
    Gao, Michael
    Nichols, Marshall
    Balu, Suresh
    Heller, Katherine
    Sendak, Mark
    O'Brien, Cara
    JAMIA OPEN, 2020, 3 (02) : 252 - 260
  • [8] A Machine Learning Model for the Early Identification of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Development and Validation
    Dreyfuss, Michael
    Jenudi, Yonatan
    Riesel, Dan
    Ramni, Or
    Underberger, Daniel
    Getz, Benjamin
    Steinberg-Koch, Shlomit
    White, Douglas
    Myasoedova, Elena
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 76 : 992 - 994
  • [9] MACHINE LEARNING FOR EARLY PREDICTION OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Chang, Yale
    Antonescu, Corneliu
    Ravindranath, Shreyas Raj
    Dong, Junzi
    Lu, MingYu
    Vicario, Francesco
    Wondrely, Lisa
    Thompson, Pam
    Swearingen, Dennis
    Acharya, Deepak
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 278 - 278
  • [10] Machine Learning Model Validation for Early Stage Studies with Small Sample Sizes
    Larracy, Robyn
    Phinyomark, Angkoon
    Scheme, Erik
    2021 43RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2021, : 2314 - 2319