Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED): Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of a Single-Blind Randomized Study

被引:277
作者
Rush, A. John
Trivedi, Madhukar H. [1 ]
Stewart, Jonathan W.
Nierenberg, Andrew A.
Fava, Maurizio
Kurian, Benji T.
Warden, Diane
Morris, David W.
Luther, James F.
Husain, Mustafa M.
Cook, Ian A.
Shelton, Richard C.
Lesser, Ira M.
Kornstein, Susan G.
Wisniewski, Stephen R.
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
STAR-ASTERISK-D; MEASUREMENT-BASED CARE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; MAJOR DEPRESSION; RATING-SCALE; BUPROPION-SR; COMBINATION; DISORDER; TRIAL; AUGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111645
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Two antidepressant medication combinations were compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy to determine whether either combination produced a higher remission rate in first-step acute-phase (12 weeks) and long-term (7 months) treatment. Method: The single-blind, prospective, randomized trial enrolled 665 outpatients at six primary and nine psychiatric care sites. Participants had at least moderately severe nonpsychotic chronic and/or recurrent major depressive disorder. Escitalopram (up to 20 mg/day) plus placebo, sustained-release bupropion (up to 400 mg/day) plus escitalopram (up to 20 mg/day), or extended-release venlafaxine (up to 300 mg/day) plus mirtazapine (up to 45 mg/day) was delivered (1: 1: 1 ratio) by using measurement-based care. The primary outcome was remission, defined as ratings of less than 8 and less than 6 on the last two consecutive applications of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report. Secondary outcomes included side effect burden, adverse events, quality of life, functioning, and attrition. Results: Remission and response rates and most secondary outcomes were not different among treatment groups at 12 weeks. The remission rates were 38.8% for escitalopram-placebo, 38.9% for bupropion-escitalopram, and 37.7% for venlafaxine-mirtazapine, and the response rates were 51.6%-52.4%. The mean number of worsening adverse events was higher for venlafaxine-mirtazapine (5.7) than for escitalopram-placebo (4.7). At 7 months, remission rates (41.8%-46.6%), response rates (57.4%-59.4%), and most secondary outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusions: Neither medication combination outperformed monotherapy. The combination of extended-release venlafaxine plus mirtazapine may have a greater risk of adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 701
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale
    Altman, EG
    Hedeker, D
    Peterson, JL
    Davis, JM
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 42 (10) : 948 - 955
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
  • [3] Combination of Antidepressant Medications From Treatment Initiation for Major Depressive Disorder: A Double-Blind Randomized Study
    Blier, Pierre
    Ward, Herbert E.
    Tremblay, Philippe
    Laberge, Louise
    Hebert, Chantal
    Bergeron, Richard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 167 (03) : 281 - 288
  • [4] Mirtazapine and paroxetine in major depression: A comparison of monotherapy versus their combination from treatment initiation
    Blier, Pierre
    Gobbi, Gabriella
    Turcotte, Julie E.
    de Montigny, Claude
    Boucher, Nathalie
    Hebert, Chantal
    Debonnel, Guy
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 (07) : 457 - 465
  • [5] A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of antidepressant augmentation with mirtazapine
    Carpenter, LL
    Yasmin, S
    Price, LH
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (02) : 183 - 188
  • [6] Cleary P., 1977, Drugs Under Exper Clin Res, V1, P115
  • [7] *DEPR GUID PAN, 1993, DET DIAGN AHCPR PUBL, V1
  • [8] *DEPR GUID PAN, 1993, CLIN PRACT GUID NUMB, V2
  • [9] Fava M, 2001, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V62, P4
  • [10] Current status of augmentation and combination treatments for major depressive disorder: A literature review and a proposal for a novel approach to improve practice
    Fava, M
    Rush, AJ
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2006, 75 (03) : 139 - 153